employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Solen Software Group

Is this your company?

A company with great vision, principles and will to win. - Operating Partner Solen Software Group Employee Review

5.0
26 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Solen Principles of Transformation and Solen-isms are great pros of the company. Some of principles that stand out are: Create Purpose for Existence, Institute Leadership, Institute Agency, Focus with Intent and Governed by Opportunity. And some of the Solen-isms that stand out are: Ownership Mindset, Mutual Elevation, Will to Win and Figureitoutiveness.

Cons

The startup vibe where not all processes are in place and not all roles are defined, creates an environment with more ambiguity that require specific profiles and personality to work here.

Explore other reviews about Solen Software Group

5.0
15 Jun 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Awesome team Informative crew Awesome Culture High Growth

Cons

Small Team Unstructured process subject to deal flow

1.0
9 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There were many talented, hardworking, and genuinely good people throughout the organization. One of the few silver linings was the opportunity to learn. Because employees were frequently anticipated to perform the responsibilities of multiple positions while being compensated for a single role, individuals gained exposure to a wide range of functions and developed skills well beyond their job descriptions. While the workload and expectations were often unsustainable in my view, many employees left with significantly broader experience and knowledge than they had when they arrived.

Cons

* Bonuses were not always paid as employees expected based on their compensation agreements and communications from leadership. For example, an employee completed the work period for which a bonus was expected, remained employed through that period, and never received the payment. The employee was subsequently terminated without receiving the bonus they had already earned and been told they would receive in full, months prior, through two channels of communication. Concerns regarding bonus payments and compensation practices were raised by multiple individuals during my time with the company. * On one occasion, I received a request from leadership that I believe involved the falsification of records. The situation raised serious ethical concerns and conflicted with my professional standards and values. * The company's stated values did not consistently align with my experience. Accountability appeared uneven, and leadership support was often difficult to obtain when employees needed guidance or resolution of workplace issues. * Turnover was significant during my time with the company. Employees frequently departed, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, creating a challenging and often unstable work environment. Extra work was often then put on an already overwhelmed employee's plate. * In some instances, performance concerns appeared inconsistent with prior feedback, accomplishments, or contributions. * Prospective employees should conduct thorough due diligence before accepting a position. Compensation did not reflect the workload in my experience, and the demands of the role often extended well beyond normal working hours including weekends. * Work-life balance was extremely limited in my view. Employees were routinely made to feel the need to be available during evenings, weekends, vacations, and personal time, making it difficult to maintain healthy boundaries outside of work. * Experiences during my tenure significantly impacted my trust in leadership and left me with concerns regarding accountability, treatment of employees, and leadership decision-making. The frequency of conflicts, disputes, and strained professional relationships I observed were concerning and contributed significantly to my overall perception of leadership and the cultural fallout. * For me, requests for clarity regarding role scope, responsibilities, workload, and compensation often went unanswered or unresolved. While additional responsibilities could be assigned quickly, meaningful discussions regarding role alignment, support, resources, and corresponding compensation did not receive the same level of attention. * Low candor

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All