Great mandate, but poor leadership and toxic culture - Anonymous employee UNITAID Employee Review

1.0
27 May 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great reason of existence, innovative projects, the organization has an very interesting and important position in the public health landscape, some very resourceful and intelligent colleagues.

Cons

The organization shines externally but rotten from inside. Toxic culture due to lack of leadership. Lots of favoritism and nepotism, no meritocracy. Problems are concealed from the Board. Senior management egos are huge, they care of only their careers. Staff demoralized, many people on medical leave because of burn-out.

Explore other reviews about UNITAID

1.0
13 May 2016
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pays really well, inspiring mission

Cons

Chaotic management, everyone was out to get someone

6
2.0
2 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A noble mandate, a collaborative work environment, and attractive benefits, a team of intelligent and highly skilled colleagues

Cons

The organization is plagued by rigid and outdated management practices, stifling innovation and hindering internal progress. There is a significant lack of integrity in human resource management, with nepotism running rampant and promotion opportunities restricted to a select few within the senior leadership’s inner circle. While the UN system at large faces existential challenges, senior management continues to prioritize personal interests and favoritism, disregarding the actual staffing needs of the organization. The organization is overstaffed at the senior level - P4/5 and above, with new very senior positions being continually created to promote favored individuals. These new positions, however, are not always reflected in the human resources plan approved by the Board after the recent functional review. The flexibilities granted by the Board and the WHO Human Resources department are being significantly abused to facilitate those recruitments outside of the approved HR plan. This undermines transparency and further entrenches the culture of nepotism and favoritism, while disregarding the needs and interests of the broader organization. These issues are systematically concealed from the Executive Board, even as a significant portion of staff reports experiencing harassment and discrimination in the recent staff survey. Despite these concerns, management has failed to take them seriously, offering no tangible solutions or concrete actions. The internal justice system, including within Unitaid and the hosting agency WHO, has so far been ineffective in addressing these critical issues.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All