FEV Tutor Reviews

3.0

43% would recommend to a friend

(48 total reviews)
avatar

Reed Overfelt

57% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

FEV Tutor has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 48 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The FEV Tutor employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

48 reviews
1.0
26 Jan 2022

Run, Far far away

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many promises of growth and pay a little higher than market average to get you in the door.

Cons

Where do I begin? This place is a facade of positivity that masks an extremely toxic workplace. I recently left at the start of 2022 after a 6-month term at this company. Upon my resignation, I was asked to leave a Glassdoor review. I immediately assumed it was because all of the other reviews were so bad. At the start of the year, this company had a terrible rating. From my last day (Jan 2022) to the day I'm writing (Feb 1, 2022) this review I now see tons of new positive Glassdoor reviews from roles I never knew existed at the company... Hmm? Since when did we have a Partnership Development Exec. in Charlotte? I'm confused. I was recruited by this company and promised growth and leadership very early on. I quickly learned that these were consistent promises made to EVERYONE to keep them working harder. I have so many emails from the Senior Leadership saying let's talk about your promotion after (insert random event here). Never happened. Then senior leadership would send emails to customers and introduce me as a more senior position than what I was actually in... but my paystubs determined it all was a lie. This company overpromises on what its solution does. This leads to customer frustrations which lead to the employees feeling constantly overwhelmed from trying to clean up the mess and please the customer. Every email is required to be cc'd by the "state-based support line" only to learn that this support line is only created for senior leadership to keep an eye on all correspondence. Senior Leadership once sent a message in a group chat telling an employee in India not to join a call because he didn't know how it would be perceived by the customer. I reported this to HR because this is unacceptable. In a scenario of being overworked (on back-to-back calls from 8 AM-6 PM every day with no break and squeezing in site visits during a Global Pandemic), Senior Leadership, told me a need to "Step it up!" even though I was in the middle of presenting on-site with a customer. I mentioned this to him, and he blatantly called out someone else as being a better fit to handle the task in a group chat. Scheduled a 1:1 with my direct manager about these concerns and set up a call to look through my workload. Instead of helping me delegate tasks and take things off my plate. I was told that I was feeling anxious and overwhelmed because I had stopped attending my morning spin classes and wasn't good at prioritizing tasks. I STOPPED ATTENDING SPIN BECAUSE I WAS WORKING 24/7. We then proceeded to use the meeting to color code my calendar based on high-priority vs. low-priority meetings. I was told to cancel what my direct manager considered low-priority customer-facing meetings. Mind you these meetings that she labeled as "low-priority" were from our highest paying customer for the entire company. These customers from our highest paying account waited 2-4 weeks just to book the meetings on my schedule.... and I was told to just cancel them?!? Senior leadership lies to customers claiming we are the most flexible company and do anything for the customer in less than 24 hours. This has led to customers being frustrated about being lied to, especially when it comes to CHILDREN'S EDUCATION. Internal teammates are not communicated with regarding what's going on (technical glitches, updates, etc.) and are expected to continue to come up with solutions for problems we weren't even aware of. They claim their tutors are US-based but they are all based in India. They lie on reporting about actual student data and feedback regarding their product's success. I literally had to edit reports before sending them to customers because I would see names of our Global Ops Teammates listed as a student to boost student performance data and feedback. I would tell anyone looking to work here or buy this product to run. This is the most untrustworthy company I have ever seen and has very inexperienced leadership in EdTech.

1.0
10 Feb 2022

Unethical Company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The potential to deliver a needed service.

Cons

Please see the review titled Run, Far far Away. I agree with and experienced every single point made in that review. Senior leadership will lie directly to customers with no remorse. They tell school district leaders that they have plans for improvement but there simply is not one. They have been told of issues and concerns by numerous employees. They have had at their disposal employees with many more years experience than they in this industry but they do not implement anything that those or any employees suggest. They have no idea what Customer Success really is and they make no efforts to learn. Their selling practices are unethical. Their recruiting practices are unethical. Their salary and promotion practices are unethical. They mislead everyone from employees to customers.

2.0
13 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Working from home and schedule flexibility. - If not assigned one of the top 15 or so account, minimal micromanaging from leadership.

Cons

- The quality of tutoring is very low and not beneficial for students with high academic needs. This is primarily due to a language barrier between tutors/students and the mode of communication during tutoring sessions, which is carried out through a chat box. Student with limited reading and writing skills have significant difficulty communicating with tutors. - Partnerships are predominantly established at district levels and sales are currently inflated due to COVID relief funds allocated for tutoring. This poses a significant obstacle for actual implementation at the school level. Many teachers and principals are unimpressed with the product and do not want to spend their instructional time on something with poor instructional design. - The disconnect between the point of purchase and the points of implementation results in high volumes of unused hours, causing dissatisfied partners and unrealistic expectations for employees. - Internally, there are significant infrastructure issues. The first is the reliability of the actual product. The tutoring platform is plagued by bugs and the overbooking of tutors, which causes long delays and no-shows. - The second major liability is the lack of access to reliable and accurate data for customers. The usage data visible to the employee and the customer do not match, which has persisted for well over a year with no sign of improvement. - The two founders and leaders of the company do not have backgrounds in Education, they are successful career business and salesmen.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 48 Reviews

Glassdoor has 49 FEV Tutor reviews submitted anonymously by FEV Tutor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FEV Tutor is right for you.