Feesers Reviews

3.1

48% would recommend to a friend

(26 total reviews)

Michelle Latta

36% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Feesers has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 26 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Feesers employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Transportation and logistics industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

26 reviews
1.0
5 Feb 2023

Awful CEO

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Right now the only good thing is my coworkers

Cons

The CEO is a disaster. She only has the job because her daddy put her there. She put her boyfriend in a c-level position. She’s a total fake and hasn’t a clue.

5.0
4 Jul 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They are a privately held company and they truly care about their employees. I see the other national company salesmen constantly coming and going, but Feesers employees are, for the most part, long term. There are 37 salesmen right now, and 10 of them have been with the company for over 20 years. The best thing about Feesers is the company car. I don't have to worry about maintenance, they call and tell you when it's due for service and you are reimbursed for gas.

Cons

It is very spread out, so as a salesman who is not in the Harrisburg area you are kind of on your own.

1.0
19 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A handful of resilient, talented employees who deserve far better than the environment they’re forced to work in.

Cons

Feeser’s Food Distributors operates on a leadership model built on unpredictability, avoidance, and a surprising degree of basic managerial incompetence. The “family business” brand positioning dissolves the moment you see how decisions are made internally — or more accurately, how they aren’t. I was hired as Creative Director and ended up performing the responsibilities of a Director of Marketing without the title, clarity, or support that role requires. Despite raising the issue multiple times, nothing was formalized, addressed, or acknowledged. In three years, I had three supervisors. None stayed long enough or had the qualifications necessary to provide stable leadership. The turnover alone tells you everything you need to know. The leadership group, self-titled the “C-team,” behaves less like executives and more like a closed circle of individuals who rely heavily on outdated habits, personal allegiances, and instinct instead of strategy. Communication is inconsistent. Direction is vague. Accountability is rare. The environment functions on the unspoken expectation that employees compensate for leadership’s shortcomings. It was also common for personal priorities to take precedence over actual business needs. I was frequently redirected toward tasks unrelated to the company’s operations, while legitimate marketing work was deprioritized or ignored. When I began asserting standard professional boundaries, access to leadership narrowed and support withdrew. It became clear that compliance was valued more than capability. The company’s ongoing decline is not surprising. It is the predictable result of leadership that does not demonstrate the skills, awareness, or discipline required to steward a century-old business.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 26 Reviews

Glassdoor has 26 Feesers reviews submitted anonymously by Feesers employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Feesers is right for you.