employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Feral Interactive

Is this your company?

Feral Interactive Reviews

2.7

36% would recommend to a friend

(35 total reviews)

David Stephen

35% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Feral Interactive has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 35 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Feral Interactive employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

35 reviews
1.0
23 Oct 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are a few very talented programmers working at the company, and they are usually willing to share their knowledge with the many junior programmers at the company. Unfortunately they work offsite, and often in different time zones. The work-life balance is okay - the day is 9am-6pm and most people leave at 6 on-the-dot.

Cons

The work environment is very tense - breaks other than at lunch are frowned upon, and the nature of the work is very frustrating: an endless sea of bug fixing, with projects being killed and resurrected almost every day. The pay is very uncompetitive, which is why they seem to hire almost exclusively recent university graduates. This leads to a very fragile shared codebase being broken almost daily by careless checkins. There are a few experienced programmers, but they have their hands full most of the time. This problem is compounded with the employee turnover: someone quits or joins almost every month, and it takes a long time to train them up to a level where they can be helpful. One of the reasons for this high employee turnover is the contempt the CEO seems to have for his employees - suggestions for improving the office environment are all but ignored, and very little money is spent creating a good work environment. I may expect this from a recent startup, but this company has around 50 employees and continues to hire new students while others get tired and quit. By the time I quit (after 1 year and 3 months) I was the 3rd longest-serving developer in the company - everyone who had been there longer had already quit. When I quit, the CEO gave me no reference, and tried to get out of giving me a P45, for reasons I can't understand.

1.0
12 Feb 2020

Really awful

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Alot of the employees are very nice. I left.

Cons

Severely uncompetitive rates of pay even outside of london. Bizarre lack of direct communication everyone communicates via an IM service, talking is strictly reduced when the CEO makes his presence known. Mobiles on desks frowned upon, prepare to be scolded like a naughty school child if you have it out by the CEO Company ruled on the notion of fear Enviroment is terrible - the other office is located above a storage unit company. Mismanaged timeframes and finger pointing mentality. Everyone is clearly unhappy but too scared to discuss any of it. Wierd arbitory rules imposed, toilet breaks monitored, seeking criticism and a complete disregard for employee well being. Ideology of "your lucky to work here" when in reality the company is very small.

1.0
1 Mar 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very talented teammates, especially in the developers department. A good place where to learn what not to do as an employer, and what to avoid in your future career.

Cons

No benefits whatsoever (fruit in the office cannot be considered a benfit, and unlimited soda cans are hardly a healthy thing to be proud of). No sick policy, if you get ill everything is at discretion of the company (which, as others suggested, is a synonym for the CEO), and sick pay is the UK statutory minimum. Job titles are meaningless and intentionally fuzzy, as is CEO opinion that they are useless. The result is that since no one knows exactly what theit title is, is difficult to compare with salaries of positions at other companies, and also it's easy for management to ask people to do tasks outside of their contractual position without recognising a change in the work relationship (no change of title, no salary reviews). Salary is very poor, QA is paid sensibly less than the real living wage, all other positions are paid way less than industry average. In the meantime, the CEO pays himself hundreds of thousands of pounds in dividends each year. Production strategy is non-existant, and the company structure is severely lacking and opaque, causing all sorts of problems in planning and development. Unsurprising high turnover, incouraged by management practices and lack of any kind of attempt from the company to entice people to stay. The managers never have your back, and they either bow to the CEO's will when dealing with issues or bereavements, or they are complicit. Long 40 hours week (breaks are not considered). QA+Devs are in a separate building than Production+Design. Art is moved about. Dev building is very cold (but QA room can get super hot due to bad ventilation) and Art office is in an Access Self Storage and has only 1 dedicated toilet for 20 people. Communication among workers is actively discouraged, and in the offices reigns a weird and awkward silence. If the silence is interrputed, managers actively shush you. No Christmas office closing period. End of year bonuses are "at company discretion", and they weren't paid the past year. Legal minimum of holidays. No name in the credits of published titles. Unpaid overtime. HR cannot do anything to address workers issue without the CEOs sign off, and there are no procedures in place for complaints. People have been fired after raising H&S issues, or just because the CEO didn't like them at a personal level. The CEO doesn't like people working from home, and forced people to get back to the office in unsafe times and conditions, at first without even due process, and reprimending people that voiced concerns. The CEO is in the HR mailing list. CEO doesn't let employees know the revenue rate of sold titles. If payment day is weekend, they pay on Monday, not the day before. Overall, the company is plagued by a culture of silence and repression, management unaccountability, and if it wasn't a tech company wouldn't be out of place in victorian London.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 35 Reviews

Glassdoor has 42 Feral Interactive reviews submitted anonymously by Feral Interactive employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Feral Interactive is right for you.