employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Fortune Magazine

Is this your company?

Fortune Magazine Reviews

2.2

19% would recommend to a friend

(36 total reviews)

Anastasia Nyrkovskaya

Not enough data to show CEO approval

15% positive business outlook

Fortune Magazine has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 36 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Fortune Magazine employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

36 reviews
1.0
21 Jun 2025

Fortune is broke(n)

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Snacks are good but run out by mid week because the company can’t afford to keep refilling them

Cons

Under the previous CEO (Alan), Fortune was like Eden. We were growing, making money, knew what our purpose was, and worked for a person of character. But the CFO was a serpent, whispering in ownership’s ear about the CEO and COO. Once Anastasia had her competition cast out and took over as Fortune’s current CEO, everything began to rot and turn foul. The culture at Fortune has been distorted and disfigured into one based on fear and mistrust. Under Anastasia we’ve seen Fortune report on the RTO mandates, silent layoffs, and sundry behaviors of other companies, as Fortune commits the same DOGE-like acts against their own employees. It’s pure journalistic cowardice and a perfect example of why the American people have lost trust in news media. When Fortune published their annual list of 100 Best Companies to Work For, the union threw our own published words back in the face of management. If you worked here you’d be justified in wondering if senior leadership or our foreign owners actually read or believe the stories that Fortune publishes. Fortune has become an amalgamation of all the bad behaviors they call other companies out for. In my final nine months I saw… 🫥 people disappear…one day they’re out sick, then PTO, then gone 🚌 until there’s a problem and the recently disappeared are thrown under the bus 👿 one guy got escorted out during his final two weeks after being laid off because he was too jovial/gregarious…apparently people weren’t miserable enough 🤬 some C-suite managers have been overheard saying they don’t have time to worry about whether their team is happy or not (in fact, targeting certain individuals for misery to get them to quit/not pay severance seems to have been a HR-approved senior leadership tactic)…the Senior Leadership Team is composed of cruel, uncaring, evil people who cannot be taken at their word or trusted in any way 🚫 then they wonder why they can’t hire replacements for the people they chased off…even in the worst white collar job market in decades as many offers are declined as accepted 💸 many got laid off right before bonuses…well…right before when bonuses usually come…they were late this year…and at 50%…and if you got a bonus this year you didn’t get any pay increase…unless you were one of the people who they cheated out of the bonus entirely AND got no increase 📅 five day RTO because we have miserly, dinosaur owners, a weak CEO, no CFO to keep her in check and an expensive lease for five more years 📉 every metric that matters has tanked…traffic and revenue are in the toilet…they’re cutting wherever they can…start looking under the couch cushions for loose change…the company is circling the drain 🤐 leadership that is scared to communicate with staff…we’ve had two poorly received Town Halls and one passive aggressive nastygram when nobody came into the office during an ice storm 💊 I know of at least one person who had a medical accommodation and was asked to modify their treatment schedule over RTO 👨‍⚖️ I hear that at least two wronged former employees may be suing 🍝 no strategy…just throwing spaghetti at the wall desperately hoping something will stick 🍽️ and they let Alan out of his non-compete so he’s over at Dow Jones eating Fortune’s lunch…Fortune’s conference business is in such dire straits 💸 that they just held their premiere Most Powerful Women conference in Saudi Arabia 🤢 Alan used to say that the current owners told him he wasn’t hired to manage a brand in decline. I guess Anastasia didn’t get that same talk because managing a brand in decline is precisely what she’s doing.

1.0
17 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent benefits. Good work/life balance. Many individuals there are very talented and a pleasure to work with.

Cons

Communication and direction are nonexistent. Management at all levels has no clear goals or plans -- especially for the engineering department, which many outside of engineering treat as almost a separate company. Even within engineering, teams are walled off from each other, and there is very little collaboration and coordination. Product people and engineering people do not work together except through a single point of contact. There is no standardization on project and communication tools, and the company lives in several redundant, disconnected spaces (Atlassian, SharePoint, Asana, et cetera). Half of the company's project management lives in various Excel files floating around different Slack channels and email threads. Many engineering hours are lost to duplicate efforts or incorrect implementations because of this discord. And worse, leadership actively encourages this blockade as if it's a benefit. They also believe that the siloed nature of our teams is a good thing, and they distrust upper management, going so far as to say that the higher-ups should not be allowed to see anything related to the technical documentation or process. I use the term "leadership" loosely. In the past year, several of the managers have abruptly left or been fired with no replacements. (These company changes were never communicated or explained well, if at all, to any of us.) The remaining leadership is not good at management. They are good at the technical aspects of their jobs, but they are not effective at handling people or projects. They are fully unable to develop solid project plans, articulate requirements, set deadlines, estimate level of effort for most tasks, accept feedback, facilitate communication among teams, or work with business to drive any sort of goals or metrics. And speaking of metrics, there are very few being tracked, and even fewer are actually used to inform business decisions and project prioritization. There are zero personal goals or team goals. Nobody is tracking personal progress, gathering feedback, or helping with career growth. Nobody has even bothered to set up regular meetings with the team for any sort of progress updates or... anything. And complaints fall on deaf ears since there are personal relationships among all of these people that have impacted critical HR decisions, some of which have led to loss of talent due to unfair treatment. And despite these obvious deficiencies, upper management is ignoring them in favor of implementing a return-to-office policy as the solution for “creating more synergy” and “making great ideas happen”. I am not the only one confused by this mess. I was part of an influx of new hires, and most of us spent months just getting up to speed on the organization, the systems, and the projects. Documentation is an afterthought, what little exists is disorganized and hard to find, and there is no onboarding process. You're free to jump in and start working on things which is great for someone more independent, but considering the lack of communication and direction, any such effort is likely to be useless. Even the largest projects fall victim to this. For some reason, it was decided to create an AI chat bot on top of Fortune data. This maybe had potential if positioned correctly for a B2B or similar service, but instead, after contracting with external companies and spending however much money to develop, it is sitting in beta limbo as features get axed and nobody knows what to do with it. Meanwhile, the contractors are still on the payroll, and management is asking us to come up with ideas for other projects they can work on. WHAT?! In short, Fortune's engineering department is a rudderless startup within a bigger company that sees them as a mostly pointless afterthought (except to keep the website running and earn money from ad revenue). This perception is reinforced by the disorganization and distrust from within the department, and I don't think that will improve as long as the current leadership remains. Fortune is, by far, the most chaotic company I've ever worked for -- an impressive feat. For a company that prides itself on being so in touch with businesses and how to make them better, they are hilariously dysfunctional and inept internally.

1.0
5 Mar 2024

Avoid at all cost

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you want to get to know about the surface of media industry, discover how a big old brand yet a start-up environment operates, and want to be the gamechanger with high determination to succeed - please join!

Cons

1. Be ready to work round the clock and everything under the sun (even beyond your field of specialty), that is how they make their money (aka your salary) worthy 2. Management gets moodswing easily and will do personal-attack during weekly meeting 3. Short-sighted and procrastinate. For important, essential operation overhaul project - the management takes ages to make decision, she/he rather have the team to live with lousy processes and painful work procedures 4. High turnover rate, low staff morale, reduction of staff claimables every quarter, poor medical benefits, no bonus

Viewing 1 - 3 of 36 Reviews

Glassdoor has 40 Fortune Magazine reviews submitted anonymously by Fortune Magazine employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Fortune Magazine is right for you.