Kleinfelder Reviews

3.2

47% would recommend to a friend

(526 total reviews)
avatar

Louis Armstrong

55% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Kleinfelder has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 526 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Kleinfelder employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, repair and maintenance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

526 reviews
5.0
1 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The manager was very hands off, but always provided assistance and guidance when needed. Hours were flexible.

Cons

Mid level managers had a lot of work assigned to them and seemed slightly overworked, but were all very positive about it.

avatar
Kleinfelder Response
2y
Hi. Thank you for sharing your feedback with our team. We appreciate hearing details like this so we can understand what we are doing well and where we need to improve.
2.0
14 Mar 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has an aggressive, ambitious international growth strategy that creates opportunities for entrepreneurial professionals who have design firm experience, nation-wide and world-wide market exposure, and who are recognized, world-class technical leaders. The professional environment is fast-paced, outwardly-focused, and continually changing. The company is privately-held. Management frequently asserts that the company will remain privately-held. The company is entirely focused on shareholder value, so the potential exists for highly-compensated individuals to become enriched as direct owners of significant equity.

Cons

Kleinfelder was well known for its commitment to its employees. It was a respected geotechnical and environmental engineering firm with a strong presence in the Western US and long-term relationships with local clients. The company ambitiously expanded operations nationwide through growth and acquisition, with reasonable success. The company could boast of its remarkably low turnover rate and the longevity of its employees. Many, many individuals had been with the firm for ten, twenty, even thirty years. I knew several people who had never worked for another firm. These are the reasons I joined Kleinfelder. Notice that all the verbs are in the past tense. Around 2008, the company changed its leadership and its strategic direction. The company's stated goal became to multiply revenue by a factor of five, to a billion dollars a year. This was to be accomplished within five years by morphing into an engineering design firm, and would be implemented by re-branding, strategic hires, reorganization, organic growth, aggressive acquisition, entry into unfamiliar markets, and new relationships with clients that represented potential multimillion dollar annual revenues. Kleinfelder made the conscious decision to forego the opportunities in the local markets that had been its bread and butter, in preference for huge national and international customers. There was no safety net, no Plan B. In fairness, the company succeeded in winning an impressive number of contracts with very large clients. However, the revenues represented by these wins did not offset the loss of revenue from the company's customary work in local markets. Backlog disappeared and the layoffs commenced. Too late, the company realized that transition from a well-respected firm that was "local everywhere" to a nationally-recognized design firm didn't work out as expected. Management decided to pour large amounts of capital into local marketing efforts to recapture clients who had been neglected for the preceding five years. It didn't work very well. The core of the company is gone. Employees who had been with the firm for twenty years and more were fired or allowed to leave (or encouraged to leave). Good customers were lost. What's left is a "me too" design firm with world-wide aspirations and no name recognition, that is led by management that has never accomplished anything remotely like the firm's stated goals, and doesn't know how. Despite assertions to the contrary, employees are no longer valued. Loyalty is no longer valued. Only shareholder equity matters, although the organization is curiously inefficient. While the company boasts of a "flat structure", the fact is that this company of 1800 employees has not only a CEO, a COO, and a CFO, but also a chief technical officer (CTO), a chief information officer (CIO), a chief counsel, and dozens of vice presidents and direct owners. To support all this management bloat, utilization goals of 95 percent are the norm. Management spins the condition of the firm as a result of a bad economy, and that the firm's competitors are operating the same way, with similar results. It's unclear whether management actually believes this, but the rank-and-file certainly don't. The various personality flaws of individual managers won't be discussed, but one anecdote will illustrate the cultural issues at the top of the organization. One manager, during the keynote address at a company-wide technical gathering (attended by nearly 1000 employees), displayed incredible insensitivity when he likened the company's new strategic vision to the Spaniards' conquest of the New World. He stated that the Conquistadors' success could be attributed to Cortez' decision to "burn the boats", which was intended to signify that there would be no going back to Kleinfelder's old business model. I could only imagine what employees of Native American heritage felt at that moment. Unbelievably, the same manager reprised the "burn the boats" comment at the same gathering one year later. Kleinfelder was once a wonderful place to work in a genuine family atmosphere. Now it is just another engineering company that wishes to be a juggernaut, but bears more resemblance to the Titanic.

2.0
25 Feb 2019

Beware of GlassDoor Reviews for this company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-New ownership injected capital, but removed "Employee Owned" status from company. -Stability

Cons

-We were instructed in a company meeting back in 2017 to write positive reviews to specifically improve our positioning on GlassDoor. Attrition was considered a significant problem and management felt the (at the time) low company score was a factor. As a result, management actively pushed out lots of "positive" reviews to artificially boost the score.

avatar
Kleinfelder Response
7y
Thank you for your review. We appreciate you taking the time to provide feedback about Kleinfelder. We are very excited about the future of the organization through the new ownership as well. We have consistently asked employees to provide feedback on Glassdoor (pros and cons) as a way to gain insight into what is being done well and where improvement is needed .
Viewing 1 - 3 of 526 Reviews

Glassdoor has 557 Kleinfelder reviews submitted anonymously by Kleinfelder employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Kleinfelder is right for you.