LiveWorld Reviews

3.2

54% would recommend to a friend

(83 total reviews)

Peter H. Friedman

64% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

LiveWorld has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 83 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The LiveWorld employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

83 reviews
1.0
21 Aug 2016

Run Far, Far Away, As Fast As You Can

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work from home, ability to set schedule parameters

Cons

The founder/CEO wants a software company, not a social media management company. Unfortunately for him, the software LW peddles is atrocious, and so for the moment, he's stuck as a social media management company. He places all hope in a small handful of large clients, and except that, LW is not a start up. After 20 years in business, the company should have a long list of well established clientele, OR marketable software...they have neither. As such, the companies hopes and futures lay in keeping a couple clients happy, and the dream of being a software company means that the software can never ever be the problem, rather it's always human error. Moderators (now called Agents, in an attempt to distance their humanity from their job title) are constantly being blamed for any and all mistakes, even when the mistake is entirely technologically related, because losing even one more (added to a rather long list of clients LW has lost over the past few years) would be disastrous. These 'Agents' are underpaid (LW pays approximately $3-$5/hr below industry standard, and approx $20k/yr below industry standard for client service managers), they are under appreciated (the idea of praising an 'agent' for good work, for stepping in for extra coverage, for working outside their normal availability all go unnoticed), they are constantly bombarded with scoldings and bullying tactics in an attempt to get them to fear for their jobs (and it works. Most 'agents' sign into their email daily and cringe, wondering what scolding or threat is coming today), and are all around treated like disposable chattel who don't even deserve basic benefits. In an attempt to thwart the employee mandate of Obamacare, in January 2016, hours for all US based 'agents' were capped at 29.75 hrs/wk. In July, a new 'pay structure' was put in place, to 'equalise' pay...a 3 tier system was set up paying 'agents' between $10-$12/hr, depending the complexity of the shift. That means that employees who had been with the company 20yrs, and those who were just hired, were now (for the most part aside from a few who were, inexplicably, already making a higher hourly wage) paid exactly the same. Raises are something LW doesn't dole out, regardless of length of employment, increasing the feeling that 'agents' aren't seen as human. Adding to the company culture of fear for livelihood, which is instilled in all 'agents' at the very start, a culture of distrust is cultivated by management continuing to ignore their own established, published for the entire company to see, QA protocols. The extent to which this policy is ignored is entirely based on the personal feelings a manager has for the employee. If you are well liked by a client manager (read: you do what you're told, never question, and all around act like a brainwashed robot), then mistakes are swept under the rug, or blamed on someone else. If, instead, you are disliked by management, the harshest punishment possible is inflicted for every tiny error, including ones which are the result of bugs in the software. As a result, productivity is directly impacted. 'Agents' are well aware that the less content moderated over a shift, the less likely any mistake will happen, and thus less likely for scolding and threatening emails to show up in your inbox. As a company, LW is on a track for complete and utter destruction. They can remove senior moderators with training and education and years of experience, and replace them with nubile newbies, and it won't make a difference. All it would take for LW to fold would be one major client leaving, and taking the jobs of roughly 100 'agents' and, at minimum, 5 managers with it. In reality, LW is imploding from within, and the Powers That Be refuse to see the problem, instead living in Happy Dream Land where they'll sell their buggy, incomprehensible, non-user friendly software to big name companies to do their own in house moderation, make millions, and be the new starts of Silicone Valley. Unfortunately for Happy Dream Land, LW has been trying to do this for 20 years, and hasn't been successful. It's time to take a good, hard, honest look at the future of the company, before there's no one else around to shoulder the blame for your failures.

1.0
25 Apr 2018

Moderator

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Easy money but you will make very little. Work from home.

Cons

Extremely few hours, I averaged about 1.5h a week. They have far too many moderators and they will give you VERY FEW hours if you're at a higher payrate. The low payrate moderators might get more hours but the pay is so low that you just work more and get paid about the same. No pay increase or any sign of appreciation for 12 yrs I worked there. You cannot work from your phone which is very frustrating when you are given work for half an hour a day at a designated time a couple times a week so you have to plan your day accordingly to make 5-10$. They will harass and call you if you haven't shown up for your shift in 3 minutes. They will only allow you to be late a few times with their Tier1-3 warning system. And even when you haven't been late or missed more than one or two shifts lately, they decide to let you go with a list of various reasons that are made up. All this after over a decade of commitment to this strangely desinged and managed company that is selling itself as some cutting-edge industry leader but has more problems than any other company I've worked for. They also change their systems and platforms often so you have to actually take time to learn them, all for your 10-20$ pay a week. You will also be treated like a robot and will never feel like a human in the system or valued in any way. I have no idea why I stuck around as long as I did. There is no reason to work for this employer, they will use you and you will make very little income.

1.0
10 Dec 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I had total loyalty to this job. I loved the fact that I could pretty much work when I wanted to. Going to school full time and being able to pay the rent (when the hours were good) was awesome. Even better, I got to work in my pajamas.

Cons

Poor management skills and no review process. When you did badly, however (and that is subjective), you could look forward to getting at least a couple of emails telling you what you did wrong. However if you broke your neck to cover for people last minute, and did it often, there was not a single shred of gratitude for your hard work. Hours were cut with no notice, but you had to give notice to request time off. A lot of backstabbing going on. Lack of trust among moderators (there were the favorites, and the others). I have never worked with a more unprofessional group of people. When you're writing a letter to your boss attacking another moderator, you might want to make sure you don't "accidentally" send it to the whole team. Of course, complaining about that, will get you "laid off to reduce head count." I gave that job almost 3 years of my life. I missed out on doing things with friends and family to help cover hours or to pick up extra ones. My time at Liveworld was well spent, or so I thought, until my last year there.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 83 Reviews

Glassdoor has 90 LiveWorld reviews submitted anonymously by LiveWorld employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if LiveWorld is right for you.