Soroco Reviews

3.4

64% would recommend to a friend

(361 total reviews)
avatar

Munjal Jhala

100% approve of CEO

52% positive business outlook

Soroco has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 361 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Soroco employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

361 reviews
1.0
14 Mar 2021

Toxic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Nice WeWork office space in central London (pre pandemic) -Great team spirit in London -Decent salary -Read reviews with care, many of the 4 and 5 star reviews are fake

Cons

-Let me take you through a typical quarter at Soroco. It starts out with ignoring all results and trends from previous periods leading to the setting of completely unrealistic goals - and I really mean insanely unrealistic - by senior management. This goes across almost all parts of the company from sales quotas to product development milestones. Next up is getting people down the hierarchy lines to agree to these goals which is mostly done by applying pressure (there really is no culture of compromise). After a couple of weeks, it then becomes evident that goals are unreachable, putting senior leadership into panic mode. This is when the pressuring gets accompanied by blaming and bullying. I’ve seen people getting told off and shouted at in front of an entire meeting audience for not reaching goals that they were forced to agree to in the first place. Here, the terrible culture established by senior management is at full display, Sales will blame the Product, the Product team will blame Customer Success and so on. The last stage of this cycle of misery is people quitting or getting fired. In the time I was there, about half the people would leave or get fired within a year or so of joining. And then the whole thing starts over again. (According to LinkedIn, median tenure is 1.4 years, meaning half of the people don’t even make it half way through their second year which is in line with my observations) There are a couple of other alarming facts worth highlighting -The product doesn’t work. This is usually blamed on the customer or the customer success team. Deceiving customers is also common to disguise shortcomings. The product is years away from being able to do what is claimed it can do. New features are constantly developed under relentless pressure by overworked and underpaid engineers leading to quality issues. These features are never based on any research or market validation but solely on what the founder deems to be right. Core problems are ignored or swept under the rug (Theranos anyone?) -Diversity is non existing. There are virtually no women at this company. Senior leadership consists entirely of middle aged Indian men, mostly old friends of the new CEO or the founder. Most of them come with an old school 90s IT service background entirely unsuited for a startup. If you’re looking for an American tech start up, look elsewhere -If there is a choice between the company or the employees, the company will always be put first (e.g. cheap expense policy, no perks, reluctance to pay out bonuses, no wfh support, weekend work, regular calls at 6pm on a Friday) -I’ve listed many issues and I could have continued this list endlessly but I want to conclude with what I believe to be the root cause and that is the leadership team which looks strong on paper but is entirely unsuited to lead a company. The arrogance, feeling of entitlement and lack of self-awareness on display are unbelievable and unbearable. The culture is horrendous, hostile and intransparent, employees are being lied to or kept in the dark (e.g. a promise was made that no one would get fired due to Covid only to flet go people 2 months later blaming their performance. To make matters worse, leadership tried to hide this. Some people only found out about their colleagues being fired when they stopped getting responses from them on the internal chat system)

2.0
30 Jun 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Passionate about technology and academic research.

Cons

Organisation lacks clarity on developing an organisation to achieve its goals, including upskilling middle managment. CEO is a bully; high levels of micro management. Culture fosters a toxic work/life balance. Product Managment team are technically focused, they are directed this way, and lack any insight/empathy into understanding end user challenges to build a quality product. Organisation funded by founder's inheritance, would benefit from external investment to challenge strategic direction and decision making.

avatar
Soroco Response
9mo
Thanks for taking the time to share your experience. Feedback like this helps us reflect on how we operate—across leadership, product, and culture. We’re focused on building stronger teams, improving clarity, and evolving how we work. If you’d like to share more specifics, feel free to reach out to a member of the People Team—we’d appreciate the opportunity to learn more.
4.0
28 Dec 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supportive management and team Collaborative work culture Standout product in competitive market

Cons

Remote work, hence, fewer opportunities for in person interaction

avatar
Soroco Response
3y
Thank you for the feedback - a collaborative and growth-oriented work environment with talented people is what we live by! Our flexible work arrangement provides the benefit of working remotely as well as from the office for those who prefer that. We strongly encourage people to meet up in-person on a regular basis to build connections as Team Soroco. If you have any suggestions on how we can improve your experience, feel free to reach us at life@soroco.com.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 361 Reviews

Glassdoor has 376 Soroco reviews submitted anonymously by Soroco employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Soroco is right for you.