studioD Reviews

3.3

56% would recommend to a friend

(43 total reviews)

Sean Moriarty

100% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

studioD has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 43 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The studioD employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

43 reviews
1.0
26 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I can do this job from home

Cons

They reject every article for knitpicky reasons that the editor should be editing. The responses from the editors probably take longer than actually editing the articles. I think the rejections are intentional so that the writers never get paid. It's a big scam. Don't think you'll ever make the $25/article that you're promised because they'll tell you to make simple corrections and then reject the article for a completely different reason, oftentimes for what they suggested you change.

1.0
20 May 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is often on-time through PayPal.

Cons

frequent revision requests, editors who are often confused about guidelines, arbitrary decisions to put writers in a probation program (while simultaneously sending an email congratulating you for being "one of their best" and awarding a special assignment.)

2.0
7 Nov 2014

Not Worth It

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Work from home That's about it. When articles are plentiful, it's a good source of income. But articles haven't been plentiful for years.

Cons

-Article availability: Demand broke every category into separate sections they require writers to apply to individually. This greatly decreased the amount of available work. Furthermore, they've lost many of their partners and clients, leaving very few (none for months, at times) articles, most of which are rewriting old and outdated/inaccurate eHow titles. -They Expect Too Much, then ignore qualifications they require: Most sections require a degree or years of experience in a related field. IE- Some kind of tech degree for the tech section. Yet even though you must be a qualified expert to write for a section, they still require a reference for literally every statement, fact, process or instruction. What's the point of the experience or degree if every statement is treated, by default, like the writer doesn't know what they're talking about? -Low pay for the amount of work involved: $25 an article may seem like a good rate, but between doing the required amount of research, finding and claiming titles that actually make sense, adhering to their strict, ever-changing guidelines and the Russian Roulette of an editing process (one editor may approve where another would ask for a full rewrite), it typically takes well over an hour to claim, research and write an article. May be good pay compared to other content mills and work for novice writers, but anyone with DMS-level qualifications and experience could probably do a lot better than DMS.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 43 Reviews

Glassdoor has 95 studioD reviews submitted anonymously by studioD employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if studioD is right for you.