I recently interviewed with NeuroLeadership Institute, and unfortunately, the process left much to be desired. The interview involved three separate activities that had to be completed within one hour. While I’ve successfully performed all of these tasks in my professional experience, the one-hour time constraint was unrealistic and disconnected from the realities of the corporate world. Tasks like these require thoughtful attention, not a high-pressure rush to meet an arbitrary deadline. This approach raised a red flag for me about the company’s expectations and overall culture. To make matters worse, after completing the interview process, I was ghosted. I received no follow-up or feedback, and they didn’t notify me whether they were moving forward or not. This lack of communication felt unprofessional and dismissive of the time and effort I put into the process. I would strongly encourage NeuroLeadership Institute to reevaluate their interview structure and improve their communication with candidates. These changes are essential to attract and retain strong talent.