The interview process at VGS was lengthy and, at times, opaque. I had six interviews with seven team members across various departments — support, product, engineering, project management, and revenue leadership. Each person I spoke with was kind and professional, and I genuinely appreciated the opportunity to learn more about the company and its people.
The process seemed thoughtfully structured at first, with clear handoffs between rounds. However, as things progressed, there was a noticeable shift in communication, especially after the final interviews. The final rejection came via a templated email, without any personalized feedback, despite the considerable time investment.
One red flag was that the compensation range was lowered mid-process, with no corresponding update to the job description. When asked, the recruiter stated the role was “less project management than initially thought,” yet the responsibilities (and team expectations) still leaned heavily in that direction. This made things feel misaligned, and I wish there had been more clarity up front.
Overall, VGS seems like a company full of sharp, capable people, and I appreciated the conversations. But the process left me feeling disappointed and drained — not just because of the outcome, but because of how it was handled at the end. If you’re applying, I’d recommend getting upfront clarity about the role’s scope, salary range, and team structure.
