Conduktor Reviews

2.8

44% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)

Nicolas Orban

33% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Conduktor has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Conduktor employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
1.0
23 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company was genuinely fun to work at. The engineering team was so skilled and the office was always a good vibe. There was free snacks all day long and free lunches on Thursdays. The socials every month were the best thing ever and I've made life long friends because of this company. The People Ops Coordinator in London was amazing and she always made sure the socials were the best they could be! She really was the backbone of the London office for any issues you could have. The product was nice to work on with some great clients to be able to put under your name. Managers were quite good too and had weekly check-ins which ensured you always knew where you stood. Unfortunately all of that is tainted by the following...

Cons

The CEO & CTO (co-founders). In my entire time at Conduktor, I don't think I once spoke to someone who liked the CEO or enjoyed working with him. It is true that CEOs aren't there to be liked, they are there to lead companies well. He, unfortunately, does neither. He would change his mind on the direction of the company every other quarter. First it was ****, then it was ****, then it was whatever else he came up with. All in the span of under a year. His company-wide messages on Slack were always corporate BS without actually addressing the concerns that staff had. The CTO had no idea, for some reason, that he was NO LONGER an engineer. He would still contribute AI slop PRs and the engineers that worked on his team would be responsible for reviewing it. That creates such a weird position for them because would you be really honest if his PR was trash? Probably not. He never actually coded anything by hand and instead just vibe coded all of his PRs which, of course, introduced bugs into the code that engineers needed to then clean up. No one wanted to be on a team with him because of all of this but some had unfortunately drawn the short straw and you could feel that it was getting to them having to work with him. I'm really sad to have to write this review as I think the company, staff and product itself were really really cool and was a great place to work at both professionally & socially. Unfortunately, these latest layoffs where they got rid of basically their entire engineering department means the company will continue going downhill if the CEO & CTO think they have nothing to change about themselves. The CTO will keep alienating all of the remaining engineers until they all leave. One AI slop PR at a time. It's saddening to not be able to recommend this company anymore to people who might have an offer from them as they did these sort of layoffs once. SWORE they would never do it again and lo and behold, here we are with a massive layoff yet again. I can bet they will at some point mass hire again and the cycle repeats.

1.0
23 Feb 2026

Do not join!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the people and free weekly lunch

Cons

No strategy an no direction. No career development. Take months to decide on how to call a product. A big initiative that required a lot of effort from a many people was scrapped before launch. A startup moving fast is one thing, not having market validation done before wasting all these resources and time is very much another. Both CTO and CEO just do whatever they want without explaining the reasoning or even trying to get people on board. Constant push for AI and focus solely on speed not quality. CFO acting as London office manager supervising attendance and reporting back to the boss in New York . Petty and unprofessional behaviour in leadership is not uncommon. Very obvious that only “current employees “ give 5star ratings - people are told to post positive reviews here. Doesn’t that tell you all you need to know about this place?

1.0
23 Feb 2026

Good pay but not worth it

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay overall, and a genuinely strong engineering team who really cared about the work they were doing. There were a lot of talented, thoughtful people who wanted to build things properly. Pension is 3% (legal minimum) 25 days holiday (can’t buy or sell days) Working hours 9–6, 3 compulsory days in the office

Cons

They hired a large number of engineers and then, less than a year later, made around 80% of those new joiners redundant There wasn’t clear product direction, especially after most of the product team either left or were made redundant. Projects felt unstable with tight deadlines, constant priority switching, little requirements and fast-paced churn. A lot of work ended up being scrapped because products weren’t properly thought through or validated with customers. It often felt like we were building quickly without asking whether customers actually wanted the feature. There also needs to be more focus on polishing and improving the existing product, rather than constantly chasing new ideas that don’t make it to completion CTO’s approach felt chaotic, trying to act as product lead and developer simultaneously. There was a strong push towards AI-generated code over quality and maintainability

Viewing 1 - 3 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 32 Conduktor reviews submitted anonymously by Conduktor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Conduktor is right for you.