Lots of politics in Prime - Vice President BNP Paribas Employee Review

1.0
10 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good number of days off Mandatory block leave Christmas party Large investments in AI

Cons

We invest hundreds of millions in AI , however managers in charge of those projects don't understand the basic concepts and don't delegate to the relevant technical teams, that's why teams end up doing only rudimentary computations without AI to please non technical managers on technical projects. This gives the situation where we have good technical people that are let go because they don't play politics or leave because they gave up on the company. Some managers differentiate based on your origins and nothing can be done about it. Some managers have their teams solely work on powerpoint. The juniors don't learn anything so anyone that tries to leave find it tremendously difficult as they have the exact same competences as when they joined + a few years of obsolescence. The "top performers" are usually the best at being nice with their managers, not at doing their job, since half the teams survive only on political conflicts and claiming other teams' works. Management keeps getting into fights between teams, severely delaying any project we work on. If you want your project to work correctly, avoid some departments ( such as Prime), as they will actively slow down and halt your projects due to local politics and managers. If you can, you should actively avoid working for the IT and quant in London, as it would likely detrimental for your career.

Explore other reviews about BNP Paribas

5.0
9 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work overall

Cons

None I can think ok

1.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only good thing about this place were the Nespresso machines.

Cons

I rarely leave reviews, but future job seekers deserve fair warning. From day one, it was clear that micromanagement was a core operating principle here; not a quirk, but a feature. Managers routinely hovered over routine tasks, demanded pointless status updates multiple times a day, constantly changed directives, took credit for my work, and treated experienced professionals like they couldn't be trusted to send an email unsupervised. Any sense of autonomy was purely cosmetic. The culture was equally poisonous. Gossip wasn't background noise; it was practically a department function. Colleagues regularly spoke poorly of one another behind closed doors, cliques formed and hardened fast, and if you weren't part of the right group, you felt it. Unkind doesn't begin to cover it. Basic professionalism and common decency were in short supply. Management set the tone for all of it. Leaders who should have modeled integrity instead participated in the drama, played favorites openly, and addressed conflict with either complete avoidance or outright retaliation. HR was not a resource — it was a shield for bad behavior at the top. I left for my own sanity. The turnover rate here should tell you everything. Life is too short and your career too important to spend either in an environment like this one.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All