Overwhelming - Rehabilitation Support Worker Brainkind Employee Review

4.0
23 Jun 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can learn a lot in this job. The days when you really feel like you’ve helped a service user are incredibly rewarding. It’s heartwarming to build strong rapport with them and support them in achieving their goals.

Cons

Poor management at times. It can be unsafe — it's part of the job, but when a service user repeatedly targets or antagonizes an RSW, management should take it more seriously. I've seen the same service user abuse the same staff multiple times, and a simple switch could have helped both the service user and the RSW. There are lots of inconsistent rules — even team leaders, management, and the clinical team don’t agree on what's acceptable and what’s not, which is frustrating. They won’t acknowledge when you're doing a good job, but they'll point out your mistakes in front of everyone.

Explore other reviews about Brainkind

3.0
20 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good atmosphere, growth opportunities for skilled worker,

Cons

Have some issues to considering the migrant worker

3.0
12 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There were positives of the job too. Primarily being the floor staff and the service users themselves being great to work with. It is a rewarding role, and some SU's made great progress which was a joy to witness and feel apart of. I feel, if brainkind gave more funding to GAH itself, the vast majority of the aforementioned issues would resolve themselves.

Cons

As time bore on, I was left waiting for something to happen. In the sense, there was a sheer lack of activities to keep residents occupied, despite talk of an activities co-ordinator position needing filled. The onus became increasingly placed on the support workers ourselves to keep everyone safe, entertained and productive. While in-theory this sounds typical of a support work role -and the permanent floor-staff were all very passionate and caring individuals trying their best for SUs- when staffing is so poor (and it became increasingly so throughout my time there) permanent staff were required for observations, and the challenging behaviour ward, leaving agency (who were not covered to take residents into the community and also generally lacked the therapeutic relationship permanent staff had with SU) to manage the floor. Again, had this been a temporary arrangement it would be more understandable. However, it became a case of being permanently fixed on observation roles, with minimal resources to incentivise co-operation. While this took a toll on staff, with many leaving after becoming frustrated with their incapacity to have their skills and care harnessed or properly nurtured, the real disservice was of course to the SU's, who were quite simply extremely bored. Boredom causes behaviours that challenge too. So while there was a lack of stimulation, the flip side was behaviours got worse, so more observations for permanent staff, and therefore less engagement for SU's.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All