Flatliners - Anonymous employee DTCC Employee Review

1.0
29 Dec 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is competitive with the industry, though is likely to flat-line year-on-year. Employment is usually secure, though ultimately depends on how one's face fits. Work/life balance is good. Most colleagues are decent to work with. A good place for those back office employees no longer needed by the banks as DTCC (incorrectly) regards this as the required skills set.

Cons

An excessively political environment where the emphasis is on 'playing the game' rather than doing one's actual job. The lack of commercial thinking at all levels has led to a litany of high-profile failed initiatives over the past decade. The pre-eminence of Operations people at the heart of DTCC has led to a back-to-front culture whereby those closest to the clients have to justify their existence to Ops people. Career progression is based on ingratiating oneself with management, which has led to a preponderence of weak, deferential stooges running the show. Those with charisma, innovative ideas, and who speak the truth are invariably managed out. DTCC makes all its meaningful decisions out of the US leading to a US-centric thinking and poor morale in other regions. The US-driven politically-correct environment (policed by HR) drives some to distraction.

Explore other reviews about DTCC

5.0
21 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good to learn and implement

Cons

Internal politics with offshore people

4.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Internal Audit's work is meaningful and provides strong exposure across risk, technology and operations. Audits tend to focus on areas that truly matter from a regulatory and risk perspective, so you're not just checking boxes. There is a genuinely strong team culture. Colleagues are competent, collaborative, and willing to help, with a good mix of experience levels that make it a solid environment for learning. There is also clear investment in employee development. Managers often have regular career discussions, and there are ongoing efforts around training, including newer areas like AI tools and capabilities. Recognition is present, and people are generally acknowledged for strong performance. Overall, it's a strong place to build audit fundamentals, gain exposure to innovation initiatives, and develop credibility within financial services / internal audit.

Cons

Internal Audit's workload is consistently high, not just during peak periods. It's common to juggle multiple audits with overlapping deadlines, alongside continuous monitoring and other responsibilities, which can make it difficult at times. Processes can be very documentation heavy and sometimes feel rigid, which is expected in a highly regulated environment but can reduce efficiency. A significant amount of time can go into formatting, reviewing and aligning work papers to methodology. Some workflows remain manual, which adds to the overall pressure and limit efficiency.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All