Horrible experience - Anonymous employee Infor Employee Review

1.0
22 Jul 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible time (vacation and work from home) Initial good pay

Cons

Nepotism (the wife and sister of the Senior VP of Development work there and are treated special) No performance reviews, salary raises are not given by performance and they are given very rarely Management play games and pit people against each other. Sexual harrasment is not taken seriously. People gets involved with their boss, get promotions and nobody is fired when it becomes known. Projects are cancel all the time. There is not a good strategy for joining all their products

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
31 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good culture and work environment

Cons

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
2w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All