Pros
There are many talented and thoughtful people at MG, and the work itself can be genuinely meaningful. I had the opportunity to learn from brilliant and experienced professionals across teams, which was a highlight of my time. There was also a very diverse staff. It was a great experience to have so many types of people to work with.
Cons
Senior leadership often does not appear to trust the expertise of the teams they hire, which can create unnecessary friction and limit impact. Decisions and assignments can feel disconnected from the day-to-day realities of the work, and there is a noticeable gap between the guidance provided to clients and internal practices.
During multiple rounds of layoffs, reductions appeared to disproportionately affect junior staff, while senior leadership remained largely unchanged. This, combined with recurring concerns around how junior employees are treated, impacted morale and trust.
Benefits are another area of concern. A switch in insurance providers resulted in limited coverage and confusion for employees outside of the PNW. Many providers were unfamiliar with the plan, and coverage options felt restrictive depending on location. Additionally, a number of company perks appear to be centered on the West Coast, which creates an uneven experience for a workforce that is scattered across North America.
Finally, leadership turnover and decision-making at the executive level have also raised concerns about stability and long-term planning. High-level hires that are short-lived signal a lack of strategic clarity and result in wasted time and resources.