employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Metropolitan Group

Is this your company?

Metropolitan Group Reviews

2.6

26% would recommend to a friend

(15 total reviews)

Eric Friedenwald-Fishman

28% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Metropolitan Group has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 15 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Metropolitan Group employee rating is 30% below average for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

15 reviews
1.0
24 Dec 2018

Public service announcement

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

+ Opportunity to work with a multitude of clients with different needs + If you can endure at least 6 months here, you will build core traits like patience, tolerance and other persistence-based life skills needed to be successful elsewhere - MG is a seemingly captivating company with solid values and a strong mission, but the execution is poorly executed due to the toxic behavior exhibited by higher leadership and out of date work processes

Cons

There is a consistent need for project managers and executive assistants due to the high turnover rate - MG may seem like the perfect door that you open right now (if you need experience to land a better career in the future), but understand this door is a highly revolving one. If you spend nearly a year with this company, you will see an average of 10 employees leaving (no exaggeration). For a company with under 50 employees “nation wide”, this is an alarmingly high number and it speaks for itself. I emphasized “nation wide” because aside from the Portland office (under 30 employees), DC office (under 5 employees) and Mexico office (under 3 employees), the other “branches” of this company is literally one person working from home to represent that city. It’s endearing that MG strives to look like they have a bigger presence across the nation. Common reasons for departure: A lack of work-life balance, being expected to complete last minute client deliverables overpromised by a senior member in your project team (who knows full well there is not enough time and budget), and being expected to take the heat when these deadlines aren’t met. They will reassure you left and right during the interview process that this is not the case, but boy, you are in for a surprise. (Hint: not the good kind.) Recently, there was someone who left the company on her first day of work - is this enough foreshadowing? As other reviews have echoed, higher leadership tends to promote (and retain employees) during the basis of popularity. By popularity, I mean someone who lives to be agreeable, all the time. No one wants to be labeled that, so being “agreeable” is well hidden behind superficial charm and eloquent sentences. This is a communications agency at the core, after all. Senior management (please don't confuse them with “higher management”) is the only group of employees who seem truly content in their work. And if you think about all the crap they must have endured to get to where they are now, they have rightfully earned that peace. They are still severely overworked, but no one is breathing down their neck and doubting the quality of their deliverables. If you are fresh out of college and need substance on your resume, this is a good place to start. If you are an experienced professional and desperate to land something until something else better comes along, this is a good place as well. Use MG to your own advantage and soak up as much knowledge as you can, be highly agreeable if you want promotion, and keep a constant eye out for opportunities at other companies- you are going to need it.

1.0
3 Apr 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great view from the office, lots of different types of projects to work on, most of the senior staff is excellent. The environmental and public health practice areas are the best to work in and doing the best work of the company.

Cons

MG would be a much nicer place to work if employees had more autonomy (right now all work is heavily micromanaged) and the leadership team was willing to listen to feedback from employees. The company is very top-heavy and resistant to change. Given their relatively small size, they should be much more nimble and advanced.

1.0
8 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most team members are passionate about their work and are kind and interesting people. Certain teams provide staff with more autonomy than others. This is a great organization for entry-level employees interested in social change and wanting to get a foot in the door in the industry. Lots of interesting work.

Cons

This organization is not a good fit for mid-level managers and senior level employees hoping to demonstrate expertise or independent thought, contribute experience, or do things even slightly differently than leadership envisions. It does not matter how qualified you are. Decision-making rests with a very small group of people, and at the end of the day, they will do what they want to do without taking anyone else’s (often well-informed) views into account. Employees in certain units may find themselves trying to deliver products based on what they think upper management wants and will agree with, rather than improved approaches. On a similar note, micromanagement from the top trickles out throughout the organization and removes any incentive to contribute hard work — there is no point working hard when that work will ultimately be re-done in whatever image upper management has in mind on a given day. To some extent this is management’s prerogative in any organization, but in this context it is incredibly demotivating. Mid-level managers are hired for their experience and expertise, but then in some units assigned primarily administrative tasks. This seems to be for two reasons: first, upper management does not always trust staff to do their jobs, so entry-level admin tasks are the only things middle managers are really permitted to do. Second, some senior staff truly believe they should have personal assistants to manage their calendars; if these staff do not have a PA, they will turn to middle managers to do these functions (even if that is not a part of the job description).

Viewing 1 - 3 of 15 Reviews

Glassdoor has 17 Metropolitan Group reviews submitted anonymously by Metropolitan Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Metropolitan Group is right for you.