- Lack of alignment between teams, which leads to lack of efficiency on projects, inability to effectively achieve goals, and slow implementation of change
- A unique product but poorly targeted & managed. Users are eager and employees are also eager about its growth potential, but current leadership does not seem to make decisions based on innovating an amazing product or community the way it touts. Creative & effective projects are limited because leadership values quantitative results rather than quality of their decisions, quality of product experience, or maintaining positive company morale.
- Poor structure: which consistently granted undeserving managers too much leeway to make decisions and created friction between teams
- No solid HR program or reviews: employees dissatisfied with management and not being heard, valued, or appropriately placed are not granted a productive or comfortable means to seriously address concerns.
- The company is a classic example of a tech startup with plenty of potential but little heart and poor structure bringing it down. It tastes simply of execs who aim to cash in when bought out and care little for the development of its employees, fostering a healthy/strong company culture, or being outstanding. The company's brand values don't match their actions.