SW could be so much more - Scientist Sherwin-Williams Employee Review

3.0
19 Feb 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good retirement package Pay isnt top of the industry, but competitive Good Senior management group Making good adavancements in oversees markets to become a global presence Safety is a top priority throughout the company

Cons

-Poor health insurance (Aetna), You have to fight to get claims paid -No opportunities for advancement outside of Cleveland -Groupthink mentality by the Technical Senior Management, think like us or leave attitude prevents new ideas and innovations -Raise system is backwards. The better you become at your job, the less raise you get -Superstar employees get burned out quickly because they are not rewarded or recognized. Networkers get more recognition and appreciation although they produce fewer results -Company does not appreciate education. Advanced degrees are treated with less respect than Bachelors level. -No guidance or direction from Human Resources in advancing your career. -Corporate being in Cleveland prevents the company from being so much more. Many suppliers state how they hate going to Cleveland to do business because the city is a "dump".

Explore other reviews about Sherwin-Williams

5.0
13 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Steady hours and reliable schedule with consistent pay structure. Strong brand reputation and supportive training for new employees. Helpful team environment with coworkers willing to assist. Good entry-level experience for learning customer service skills.

Cons

Workload can become overwhelming during peak sales periods. Limited advancement opportunities without long tenure or relocation.

5.0
16 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A positive work environment. The best co-workers I have had so far in my career worked with me at Sherwin. I also worked under an amazing management team. There is a lot of room for career growth. I worked for Sherwin for about 3.5 years. I started as a contracted lab technician, then I was hired full time as an R&D Associate Chemist. I quickly worked my way up to R&D Chemist within a year of being hired full time. The department I worked in was very fast paced, however, I know there are many other groups that move at a much slower pace with longer timelines. This would make it much easier to manage the workload.

Cons

Working with marketing was challenging at times. We would regularly receive big requests a day before they needed something. This would pose a challenge when you had other priorities to attend to. The pay was average. I do think it could have been slightly higher for all of the job responsibilities given to the chemists in my group specifically. The workload was overwhelming at times.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All