A Call for Change - Anonymous employee Testlio Employee Review

2.0
6 Jul 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There's a nice set of benefits for full-time employees.

Cons

Challenging Collaboration Across Continents: Working with colleagues residing in different time zones presents a significant challenge. The constant need to accommodate varying schedules forces individuals to work during unconventional hours, often at great personal inconvenience. This ongoing struggle undermines collaboration and hampers effective teamwork, demanding attention for resolution. Subservient Upper Management: Upper management appears determined to safeguard their positions by unquestioningly adhering to the CEO's every desire. This unquestioning loyalty stifles constructive input and inhibits the exploration of alternative opinions and suggestions. Such a culture is detrimental to the organization, obstructing growth and innovation. Inadequate Time and Project Management: The CEO's consistent long tardiness to meetings is merely one manifestation of poor time and project management. Prolonged delays and unrelated digressions during these meetings reflect a disregard for colleagues' time and the organization's overall productivity. Additionally, the CEO's inclination to micromanage tasks that should be delegated undermines trust and autonomy among employees. Encouragement of Work During Vacations: The company's management fails to address the issue of employees working during their vacation time, while simultaneously praising those who work late nights or consistently put in excessive overtime. This contradictory behavior fosters an environment where personal time and well-being are undervalued, and employees are expected to sacrifice their leisure and personal lives for the company's benefit. Not only does this practice undermine work-life balance, but it also reveals a lack of commitment to fair compensation and recognition for the extra efforts exerted by dedicated individuals. Addressing this issue is crucial to ensure employee morale and prevent burnout in the long run. Impulsive and Ill-Considered Decision-Making: Critical decisions, such as layoffs, are made hastily without adequate forethought. Upper management rushes through these important choices, neglecting to consider the potential consequences and appropriate mitigation strategies. This approach jeopardizes the stability and long-term success of the company. False and Toxic Positivity: Despite claims of a positive company culture, a stark discrepancy exists between management's self-promoted image and the actual experiences of employees. The culture is marred by a sense of false positivity, where misery and discontent are prevalent among the workforce. This toxic environment is perpetuated by the CEO's disregard for employees as individuals, reducing them to mere numbers in pursuit of financial gain. In conclusion, I strongly urge you to address these concerns promptly and earnestly. By fostering a more inclusive, transparent, and empathetic workplace, we can begin to rectify the existing issues and lay the foundation for a healthier and more successful future.

avatar
Testlio Response
2y
Dear TestLion, This response comes from the Testlio leadership team, including the Testlio founders. We first offer situational insights as context for others outside of Testlio who might have read your review. As you know, this is a hard moment for Testlio. Our company missed several financial targets from Q2 2022 through Q1 2023. With this, we made a series of tough decisions and financial cuts, inclusive of the elimination of 13 positions (~6% of our workforce) in May 2023. None of these decisions were made hastily and all of the work that we did behind the scenes was done with as much thought, care, generosity, and empathy as possible. At the same time, we’ve been working hard on improving productivity and efficiency. We gently wonder: are the criticisms you express above stimulated and/or amplified by the moment for the company? Have you shared these concerns directly within the company via one of our seven internal feedback channels? If you care for Testlio, why post an essay like this that uses negative terms generally, as if you’re able to capture the true feelings of each person in the company? Do you truly believe, for example, that the CEO of Testlio could micromanage a ~200-person company? And as you call for leaders to “stand up” to the CEO, how do you know that doesn’t happen every single day via a culture of healthy debate, aligned with our values of “challenge things” and “give a damn”? As we currently see it, your post offers generalized observations without specifics nor without what generally appear to be first-hand experiences. It places your personal perspectives on holidays and works over others who have different ways of being and working. It also repeats some things from elsewhere: there are a few other recent Glassdoor posts that offer similar perspectives. And we’ve gone into deep detail on our responses there. For example, you can read our CEO Steve’s response and perspectives, and the founders’ support for Steve, in a review from May 10, 2023. You can read Kristel’s response to a review from May 19, 2023. You can read Jaanus’s response to a review from June 8, 2023. Also, if you go back, you’ll see that Testlio’s Glassdoor rating was 4.6+ (as high as 4.8) and Steve’s CEO rating was 90%+ (as high as 96%) for a multi-year period. During that period, our financial performance was exceptional (using the Rule of 40 and other metrics). We grew, funded initiatives, and had fun along the way. Notably, many negative Glassdoor reviews have started recently, including the three referenced above, during our latest challenging chapter for Testlio, and for companies around the world. We are not offering excuses nor trying to shift perspectives. We are sorry that the business hasn’t performed better and that we’ve made decisions that may be disappointing, saddening, and even fear-inducing. As our CEO, founders, and leaders have said repeatedly: we take responsibility. And we are sorry. Yet, we also ask: if you’ve been with Testlio for more than a few quarters, might you reflect on our better and brighter days? If you care about the company and the people in it, along with the stakeholders we serve, might you lean into our internal efforts to make things better? There are myriad of ways for you to offer input and work directly to foster the improvements you seek. For example, Steve offers open office hours for anyone and does two 1-1 “Donuts” each week with TestLions of all levels in the company. We also have 7 internal feedback channels. Your manager is always available. As is your functional leader. We hope that our response to your post is understandable—and that you also see that we wrote it not only for you but for others who might read it. We conclude by asserting that we gently but firmly disagree with several of the points you’ve raised. Per above, we’ve also addressed criticisms elsewhere, on Glassdoor and within the company. Respectfully, we are focused on returning Testlio to sustainable profitability and growth, so that we can fund important initiatives, provide exceptional service to our clients, and reward the TestLions who work hard for our beloved company daily We hope that you reflect upon the questions, provocations, and invitations that we provide here; that you meditate on the beautiful 10-year history of Testlio and the essence of our company’s values, purpose, and aspirations; and that you find new energy to join us on the next phase of our journey. There are big things ahead for Testlio and we look with excitement to the future. Kind regards, The Testlio Leadership Team

Explore other reviews about Testlio

5.0
3 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The renewed company focus allows teams to prioritize effectively and maintain alignment. The leadership team is grounded, motivated, and highly collaborative. The product strategy successfully embraces AI, positioning the company to define the future of AI testing.

Cons

The volume of organizational change over the past year was a bit high. While these pivots were clearly made to ensure both near and long-term success, so much change can lead to change fatigue. I believe that leadership maintaining the current level of transparency will be key as the org continues to stabilize under the new focus.

4.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great, friendly culture to be a remote first company.

Cons

HQ is based in Estonia so things can be slow when needing technical support with platform if youre based in US

avatar
Testlio Response
1w
Thanks for taking the time to rate your experience at Testlio!
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All