employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Hunger Project

Is this your company?

Unfortunate end to what could have been a great opportunity - Associate The Hunger Project Employee Review

2.0
10 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some of the most hardworking peopleI've met and worked with. Mostly kind team. Slack is cool. Remote work is a dream and a major pro! Met great people, learned a lot, and worked on interesting projects.

Cons

Not too much opportunity for growth unless you start at a higher level. I chose to leave my position after getting no support from HR or management about the concerns of my job duties changing, constantly. My supervisor then chose to cut my hours (on the spot) without written documentation, reasoning, or a transition plan that warranted the reduction. This felt deeply punitive and retaliatory. Although it may be legal to do technically, no one should be subjected to this treatment without HR involvement.

Explore other reviews about The Hunger Project

5.0
18 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In this organization, the country staff, who are from the countries where they work, have the wisdom and authority to do great work in partnership with communities. A lean global staff supports their work. Strong leadership is strategic.

Cons

Fundraising is an ongoing challenge. There's so much to be done.

2.0
19 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is genuinely meaningful, and most staff care deeply about the work and the communities they support. There are a lot of smart, passionate people across the organization who are trying their best with limited resources. You also get a good amount of autonomy in many roles, and there are opportunities to wear multiple hats and build experience quickly. Flexibility is the key benefit.

Cons

The internal culture often feels very disconnected from the values the organization promotes externally. There’s a lot of talk about collaboration, transparency, and people-centered leadership, but in practice communication can be inconsistent, decisions feel top-down and concerns raised by staff don’t seem to lead to meaningful change. There’s also an overemphasis on optics and organizational messaging around “culture” without enough attention paid to the actual employee experience. People & Culture initiatives felt more performative than supportive, especially during difficult staffing or management situations. Employees are encouraged to speak openly, but many people learn pretty quickly to be careful about how direct they are if they want to avoid being labeled as 'difficult' or 'negative'. Burnout and turnover feel more normalized than they should be, and a lot of operational problems end up falling on already overstretched staff to solve.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All