Worst company to work - Senior Software Engineer Veoneer Employee Review

1.0
12 Aug 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Learning curve is good if you get good project

Cons

1) In my 7 years of professional career i have never experienced such a worst work culture All Veoneer Bangalore management people are from serviced based company. They are treating employee as "Resource" and Resource can only be consumed. During Covid19 lockdown they have asked employee to work from office. After Gov instruction they agreed for WFH but they create such situation that employee has to come to office. They have removed Desktop(connected to hardware) and gave laptop to employee so that they have to come to office to access Hardware. On global level they are showing that veoneer India has offered WFH but locally they have taken all facility so that employee has to come to office. 2) Management don't bother about Employee safety during Covin19.They insurance will cover covid19 expances and if you are dead we will give insurance amount to your family. 3) High work pressure, Most of the time situation will be "I want task to be completed by EOD" 4) Worst work ethics/culture. favouritism & Biased management 5) Hike is not aligned with your performance. mostly favouritism works. 6) No transportation. 7) This is not a policy oriented organisation. It's people centric company. 8) Work life balance is worst

Explore other reviews about Veoneer

5.0
6 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong exposure , Free hand to take a project decision, Good team to work with.

Cons

Medium base salary, Good benefits

2.0
28 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Veoneer (originally Autoliv) was once a great place to work. In the early years, the culture was strong, collaboration was valued, and employees felt invested in. The work itself was meaningful, and there was pride in being part of a company focused on safety and innovation. Many of the direct coworkers were knowledgeable, dedicated, and supportive, which made day-to-day work rewarding.

Cons

After multiple spin-offs and corporate restructuring, the company culture steadily declined. Employees increasingly felt like trading commodities rather than valued contributors. Direction and focus shifted often, communication from upper management became limited, and transparency was lacking. Despite long tenure and experience the decisions around severance felt impersonal and disconnected from actual contributions or institutional knowledge. Support from upper management during transitions was minimal.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All