Culture of Inclusivity; Company is Growing and Evolving - Talent Acquisition Verisk Employee Review

5.0
26 Apr 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Verisk is filled with humble people that genuinely care about their team members as both professionals and individuals. Whether you work in Underwriting Solutions or Claims Solutions, in the offices in Jersey City, Lehi, or Boston (or even remotely), the culture is positive and you can bring your whole self to work here.

Cons

Verisk has experienced lots of changes recently. In 2022 alone, a new CEO was appointed and Verisk sold 3 business units to refocus on the insurance industry. I personally view these changes as positive: new products, innovative solutions, and clearer career paths available to employees are examples of positive changes. But change itself can be uncomfortable.

avatar
Verisk Response
3y
We are so happy to hear that you are enjoying your experience at Verisk, and specifically our inclusive culture. Our core values and commitments to learning, caring, and results are what set Verisk apart. Everything we do is inspired by our purpose, vision, and values. Do you know someone who would be interested in joining our team? As a member of the Verisk community, you can help us connect with others who are looking for a similar experience. Visit our intranet to learn more about our Employee Referral Program.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
1 Jul 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All