Fine for a short term fix - Audit Analyst Verisk Employee Review

2.0
7 Jul 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent Work/Life Balance and easy enough work

Cons

The Claims Department is heading in a downwards trajectory, big losses and Senior Management don't recognise their errors and work on them. They would prefer short term fixes

avatar
Verisk Response
11mo
Hi, we appreciate your insights! Thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. We appreciate your perspective on our leadership and management. We appreciate your feedback on our leaders and are committed to addressing concerns about leadership effectiveness. Our leadership team is open to suggestions and committed to living out our values of learning, caring, and results. Your input is valuable, and we encourage you to connect with our HR team.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All