Freedom House Reviews

3.6

49% would recommend to a friend

(118 total reviews)

Michael Abramowitz

45% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Freedom House has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 118 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Freedom House employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

118 reviews
2.0
22 Apr 2015

Program Associate

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Depending on the program, this could be a good first job out of undergrad or graduate school to begin to understand international development and the field of governance and democracy. Freedom House is well known, which can be leveraged to find a new job. Work hours are not that bad as far as DC goes, but it depends on the program. Pay is standard for organizations like this but is appalling compared to private sector and government.

Cons

Top management was totally clueless and gave directors of each program the ability to run their programs however they saw fit, regardless of quality of work, professional decorum, and decency (or lack thereof) on display. Junior staff -- and even some senior staff -- were treated as if they were totally dispensable. The nature of the work for junior staff could be totally administrative or could actually be substantive, depending on the whims and personality of program directors. The actual "work" that the organization is doing in some locations around the world is laughable and totally lacks any true impact on human rights situations. Just a very, very disfunctional organizational culture that hurts morale and makes it imperative to use the organization as a spring board to find a new position as soon as possible. Expect the worst when you're going in and you'll be pleasantly surprised if it isn't as bad as it could be.

2.0
27 May 2018

Executive Staff - Bully pulpit

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Everyone below the level of Director is carrying the organization and are subjected to abuse by HR and one Senior Exec who has no idea how to communicate openly; dictates and is an over glorified copy editor whose paid over $175k

Cons

Senior VPs - toxic, along with HR - they have no sense of what the programs do, and they do not know ethics. They allow abusive managers to remain employed and they are not above letting the abusive to enter into the area of retaliation and complicity. Execs, mainly one Senior Level VP walks out of meetings, is hostile and is a bureaucrat who acts as a buffer between staff and the new President. Rather than openness, she allows for zero dialogue and works behind the scenes to undermine the work of those beneath her. The new President has no idea how abusive his senior staff is and has been to the point of the use of the position as a bully pulpit - dishonest, unethical and no transparency.

1.0
25 Apr 2018

Systemic abuse on MENA team

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Freedom House is made up of passionate and devoted staff who work tirelessly for minimal compensation to foster human rights world wide.

Cons

The MENA team has a history of systemic abuse that creates a hostile work environment. Although the under staffing fosters learning, the management routinely relys on abusive management tactics that do not lead to professional growth or strong performance. I would not advise joining the MENA team.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 118 Reviews

Glassdoor has 154 Freedom House reviews submitted anonymously by Freedom House employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Freedom House is right for you.