Guavus Reviews

3.3

51% would recommend to a friend

(207 total reviews)

Faizel Lakhani

41% approve of CEO

36% positive business outlook

Guavus has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 207 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Guavus employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

207 reviews
1.0
25 Aug 2018

Moment of truth

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I am hoping I would learn some if Mr CEO chooses to reply to this post.

Cons

Dear Mr. CEO, I am grateful that you have chosen to address issues on Glassdoor. Finally we have a channel where we can have two way communication without fear of retaliation. Thank you Glassdoor! I would like to take the opportunity to pose a few questions that all of us want to ask but have not been able to ask. Before we start with questions, let us keep some timelines in perspective. 1. Current India management team took over in July 2017 and has been in place for 1 yr 1 month as on date 2. You took over reins in early Oct 2017 and have been at the helm for nearly 11 months as on date 3. Engineering agile transformation is also 10-11 months old. Org wide agile may be 9 months? 4. Your first visit to India was in May'18, over 3 months ago as on date You should feel comfortable with the thought that you and others have been around long enough that you cannot hide behind facade of settling in or being a change or novelty in the organization yourself. This is long enough for a leader to settle in and have an impact. If you cannot be up and performing in a years time frame then you are clearly in the wrong job. I know for a fact you would not give us a month to settle in. You need to hold yourself up to higher standards than that. 1. It would be helpful to understand your strategy. What you have articulated so far is your dream - we want to do X million. What we would love to hear is your strategy. What is the path you are laying out to get us to your dream and why would it work. If you think it is our traditional CSP market then what are we doing “differently” that would increase deal size or account size or increase number of accounts. Talking to more CSPs cannot be the answer - same effort repeated over million times gives same results. Also, I have a hunch our sales team has not been sitting around waiting for you to arrive and tell them to talk to more customers. If you think it is Thales, then again - how? By talking to them for 2 years now? What is the percent of resources we are dedicating to which opportunity? What is our expected RoI and targets for each opportunity and why they make sense? Why we will win at these? What are we not doing in order to do these? 2. What is really the transformation that you keep talking about? Going agile cannot be a goal in itself - what is the end goal? Since we went agile have we been able to: release with higher quality? Reduce development time? Build sustainable culture? Improve team morale? Engage more with customers? Deepen accounts? Unlock latent opportunities? Create new ones? I know first hand that answer to all these questions is NO. Then how are you measuring transformation? Or for that matter YOUR progress and YOUR performance? How did you figure out that this is still the right thing to do given we have lost an year and we are not even at same level as before - that is 25% of the time we had to hit our targets already GONE doing “transformations” that are not done yet and we have no results to show for it yet. If you think it would take another 12 months to complete the transformation then show us what you see - how would we hit our 4 year targets in 2 years when we are standing at the same place where we started with these transformations in place? 3. Speaking of results - by when are you expecting to see them? What are YOUR plans and milestones? 4. In the light of the same can you please help us understand how did you figure out that some of us did not have it in us to undergo a transformation? Do you know how many transformations we have seen before you even came onboard? Did it occur to you that may be we are fine with transformations but we are not fine with what you are doing which makes no sense to us? That we have been voicing concerns to help YOU see that you are pushing harder down the wrong path? You got it wrong with initiatives, you got it wrong with people. How do you figure that you are right and we are wrong? Because word of CEO is word of God? Or Spotify said this model works? Or did it work in your past life? One size fits all? 5. Did you think about the impact of CEO telling his team on a public forum that they cannot transform and hence their being kicked out is implied and necessary? No thank you sir for the pep talk and taking us all along!! Your lack of rationality, sensitivity, and empathy is appalling. Seriously what were you thinking while putting it out on Glassdoor? You think prospective employees would be thrilled to see that and jump right in - yay this is the CEO I want to work for, he really knows how to motivate and lead. The team you addressed is the same well wishing team that is trying to help you see that you are making wrong bets. Would you be surprised if you are left with just yes men leading you down the spiral? It would be fair if you asked me how do I know that you have got it wrong, may be I am wrong!! I would encourage you to look at empirical data - results you have so far, broader team feedback, an honest evaluation of organizational capabilities and culture, and finally your own performance - or you can ignore it and continue being the ostrich and call it my myopia or my loss, suit yourself. 6. Talking about performance and being able to act on the required changes - you were in India in May and got to hear first hand on two critical burning issues - HR team and India management team. You understood it well that these were huge problem areas for us. What have you done so far? 3 months is by no means a short period of time for working on burning problems afflicting more than half of your company. We have seen some difference, things have taken a turn for the worse. a. On HR front, you certainly know enough details. Under your leadership in less than a year, we have 4 different heads of HR. India HR is parasitic. I know that you know this is a huge problem. To the extent that you know you cannot address employees and their concerns through HR and hence are here yourself on Glassdoor instead of exploring HR channel that keeps dirty laundry in-house. Any average HR department would have kept a pulse and have managed to at least get these conversations going for you internally. Even after you know they are useless, why are you letting the problem fester? I do not like posting this on public forum, but where is an internal forum or channel that I can use? Don't go saying we have open culture. If you thought we could communicate internally, you would not be on Glassdoor. b. On India management issues you must have heard it every week in last so many months, again why no action? These were not opinions, these were facts and yet you could not act? Things got worse for us with retaliation that we faced because you failed us. If CEO could not do anything who could touch them now? If you still think you got your leadership team right, call them and let them walk you through a single release process end to end, who does what and who makes what decisions and how information flows - no tech. You know the answer and yet you could not act? Forget act, did you even attempt to build checks and balances? Let’s make it simpler, did you even open a feedback channel to keep abreast of the problem? Do you have single soul in India who trusts you? I do not see any attempt, even an insincere one, on your part to address a problem that should be giving you sleepless nights. c. Given your own performance score card, are you sure you are the right person for leading transformation at Guavus? You cannot act on problems, you shy away from getting deeper into details of strategy and stick to 50,000 feet visions, you have no sense of how to convert strategy into tactics, you have not been able to create new opportunities for Guavus, you have not been able to have a positive impact on people or culture or public image, you have not been able to move the company in the right direction, you have put wrong people in important places - you think you have moral right to judge that we don’t have it in us to transform? To me it seems like you trying to lay your failures at our door. Aren’t you? 7. Before you start typing out replies citing transformation and change - look at the time elapsed and annotate your answer with change management plan and a transformation plan. I hope your plan is not “announce change, tell your team to do it and keep your fingers crossed”. And while you are writing about self organizing team, pray do tell us why do we need you - sales can sell and engineering can build, and we can drink together to come up with 300 Bn USD target - much bigger dreams than what you can — seems like our self organized team is ready to go!! No? Why not? What is your value add? You think 20+ years experienced heads of sales, engineering, product etc are not self organizing enough? Doesn’t same reasoning apply to engineering teams? Think again. I am by no means anti-agile, just that I understand agile better. May be there are things I do not see. May be I will learn something new should you choose to reply. If you convince me, I would not hesitate to revise this post to a 5 star review. For once in my life, I would be happy to eat my words. Make me.

1.0
11 Apr 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart colleagues used to be the biggest attraction of working with Guavus. However, good people are leaving in droves. That leaves very little for the pros.

Cons

I guess each company goes through phases. Guavus hasn't seen a good phase for last 5 years and since Thales acquisition, it has entered it's darkest phase ever. I work for India engineering so my review would be biased towards conditions in India. India engineering has the distinction of being lead by management that has no engineering background, no context of what they are doing, and no context of culture. Icing on the cake - they doesn't listen to anyone - except those who suck up to them. In other words - they listens only to yes men. Needless to say, they hear yes all the time :) Bunch of smart senior leaders who helped point out issues and gave sound advice were seen as opposing forces and have been forced to resign. Smarter rank and file is resigning on their own and leaving. Since all of these show up as resignations in the records, all exits are being portrayed as attrition due to change and transformation. Their inability to separate out personal liking and relationships from professional roles is shocking. If you are on their good side, you hang out with them on weekends, and spend evenings partying with them - you are gold and ready for a promotion. Don't believe me? Proof is in the pudding. Whole engineering is sitting in India, whole product was built in India, however, documentation writing team has to travel internationally to document the product - several times a year. And all this while engineering has no budget for hikes or sending engineers to conferences, events, or even customer meetings. Guess the reason :) Guess who was proposed as being classified as most critical resource in the org - a document writer. Sure you could find IITians with 10 year experience in big data a dime a dozen but where would you find someone who knows English and can create a PDF. Change and transformation is the smoke screen being used to perpetrate unbelievable levels of management stupidity. The claim being made is that we are going "agile". Engineering was always agile giving out releases every 3 weeks with pretty decent quality. However, it was claimed that engineering is "too slow" and needs to "go agile" and hence we need a re-org. So we went from well oiled working agile to dysfunctional agile and in the garb of the re-org they pushed out non-yes-man senior technical leadership. It was shocking to witness how Guavus treated its 15+ years experienced technical leaders who had all spent more than 5 years each at Guavus. As a result there is palpable fear in the organization - if you speak up, you may be sitting at home tomorrow - no kidding. And as a result of "going agile" we now have 6 program managers for 40 developers. Since each team is now "self organizing", it does not need technical leadership (force them out of the company) but each "self organizing" team needs a non-technical agile program manager who basically tells the team what to do. Good luck getting things done. So here we are in a product engineering organization being led by non engineering leadership who know nothing about engineering or Indians; organized as "self managed" teams with no mentoring and technical leadership and an army of technically incapable, never been leaders, program managers telling us what to do. The way things are and given the exodus that has started, in next 6 months Guavus would be left ONLY with yes men and those who could not find another equal paying job or those whose inertia is more than their self respect. This begets the question - why CEO is unable to correct the situation? It is hard to believe that a CEO could be so dumb to not see through all this - at the very least he should have known that team was already agile. He should at least have known the team composition. He should have at least known the importance of technical leadership. If only we had a good CEO chosen by Thales.

1.0
23 Jul 2018

Clueless management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pros are all history. Clueless unqualified management has messed up everything. I wish we return to good times some day - after this management is kicked out.

Cons

You can never find management as clueless as here. CEO and his team visited India to understand the problems. Team readily shared the information. We were promised action. NOTHING happened. Either they thought entire team was lying or did not have strength to act on feedback. Unqualified India management does not know what is going on or what to do at all. Whole team, morale, culture is going down day by day. Only politics and no work. This is the only company where architecture team works on PPT only Where architecture completely disowns product performance Where taking initiative is seen as stepping on toes Where we have 5 CTOs and no direction Where whole management silently watches as a theoretical model is force fitted with disaster results and huge amount of money is wasted on incompetent leadership and process consultants. Had we spent 10% of this amount on team's technical training, results would have been different. Good people have attritioned. There is a clear leadership vacuum. We have made mistakes at every step and we are not ready to correct them - because here we celebrate failure not success.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 207 Reviews

Glassdoor has 230 Guavus reviews submitted anonymously by Guavus employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Guavus is right for you.