Jumpstart Reviews

4.0

70% would recommend to a friend

(354 total reviews)

Naila Bolus

68% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Jumpstart has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 354 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Jumpstart employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

354 reviews
4.0
14 Mar 2023

nice

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

fulfilling great experience for narrative building involved in child and education development

Cons

the work does not necessarily feel like it matters all of the time

1.0
1 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Corps members (paid volunteers) love Jumpstart. It's a great way to gain ECE experience and work with kids. The work they do with under-served children is invaluable. As a staff member, the benefits were great and the salary was fair. I would have worked for Jumpstart for a very long time if it had not been driven into the ground by poor decisions and an incompetent CEO.

Cons

Two massive layoffs in 2 years and constantly shifting priorities, duties, staff, and supervisors make for a very stressful work environment. Each year the funding is less and less. Every 9 months, employees have to wonder if their position/site will be funded for the next year. Supervisors either dodge working at all or control all information to give themselves a sense of importance and job security. This is not that way organizations should be run.

3.0
2 Dec 2018

Site Manager

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Important mission that addresses marginalized community need; rewarding to support volunteers (Corps members) with leadership/professional development; opportunities to work both at the university and community as you cultivate relationships with program partners, corps members, university staff, other Jumpstart staff; effective model when the right support exists to implement high-quality program

Cons

The Site Manager position is the programmatic position most responsible for supporting day-to-day implementation of the Jumpstart program, but it requires an unrealistically wide breadth of work with often inadequate technical support from Jumpstart; pay was not aligned with amount of work, was not adjusted based on cost of living, and is inconsistent across sites; inconsistency in terms of prioritizing/supporting Site Managers with professional development; lack of diversity (majority of staff in management positions are white cis-women) and occasional culturally insensitive marketing (internally and externally) despite the majority of targeted population being POC

Viewing 1 - 3 of 354 Reviews

Glassdoor has 405 Jumpstart reviews submitted anonymously by Jumpstart employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Jumpstart is right for you.