Nuclei Reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(124 total reviews)

Ankur Joshi

81% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

Nuclei has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 124 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Nuclei employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

124 reviews
5.0
13 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredibly talented people working for sustainable growth while helping others grows Best work-life balance, amazing work culture

Cons

can't think of anything rn

3.0
9 Jul 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

So I can only talk about my experience in the company, and it can vary from person to person depending on the situation and the team that you are in. I’ll try be specific as the devil is in the details. Pros: 1. Your ideas are valued, from my experience I can tell that even a newly joined fresher can pitch in ideas on how to solve a problem. There is flat hierarchy. There is no-one stopping you to get involved in other things and contribute your ideas, although this happens very less lately. 2. You get to work with talented and dedicated peers(mostly). It depends on per-team basis, but I got the chance to work with probably the best team in the company. Almost everyone is approachable for anyone to seek help from. 3. High risk high reward. Startup 101. You have to put in more effort than a fully established company, but then again you would know this because company usually hires people who are comfortable with such environments only. For a fresher out of college this will be a really good learning experience. 4. One can learn a lot of things in tech from backend to infra to database to system design. There’s no-one stopping you from exploring something. 5. The Friday sessions keep things lively in the company. 6. Pay is ok. Nothing that I would complain about.

Cons

1. Company as an entity doesn’t respect its employees, at least I’ve seen that in the tech side. Don’t even have to tell about appreciation. A team slogged off for a month to release something, just after releasing they pressure for the next thing in the same manner. 2. Pressure on the newly joined interns. Treating them as if they are fully experienced employee makes it difficult for the intern to match the expectations. 3. Mostly a sales-oriented company, it’s like sell the product first and then pressure the teams to reach the deadline. Maybe good to be part of sales team, but rarely any efforts put to fix the already piling up tech debt. All the things the tech teams are working on, are the things that were already promised to the clients. Good for sales team maybe, but it’s very very rare that a dedicated sprint is allocated to optimise on things or look at things in broader perspective. 4. Turning into a service based company, can’t change my mind on this(you know who you are). The “picking up this new product because of money” wasn’t the attitude of the company when I initially joined in. 5. Literally no seniors, obviously you can learn things from your peers, but once you capped that skill level, you are in oblivion. There is no one to help you out or critique your idea, you won’t be learning anything after that point. 6. Theres no other nicer way for me to put this, but CTO either needs to do his job or needs to be replaced. It’s not helping anyone. 7. Adding to the my above point, literally no effort to hire seniors in tech as well, I’ve personally talked about this 5-6 times to the management. After some time I came to realisation that, company just wants to make some money even though if it means that the product is sub-par. 8. Looks like they are playing with the new batch of interns. Firstly, they hired more than what was actually needed, with less strict interview process. Then when more number of people turned up they didn’t know what to do. They already removed few people during internship, and they have deferred full time offers for more than half of people, giving corona as the reason. Although on the inside we know that they would’ve done that without the pandemic as well.

1.0
13 Apr 2021

Worst Company, No Ethics

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros, only cons

Cons

I was one of the 39 interns they hired in 2020 for internship and full-time opportunity, (clearly mentioned in the LOI that it is a full-time offer, not performance-based). I mentioned this because I am from the reputed college and I had many options but I fell in their trap. Basically what they do is they go on 0th day for campus placement and try to hire best students from that college. Why did I fell in trap? The reason is they offer 20LPA in which base pay is 10LPA and rest is performance bonus and ESOP (which has no value yet) and as a student you generally don't think of base pay and all, you just see 20LPA. Please don't do the same mistake. At the end of April, they suddenly fired nearly 9 interns giving the reason that their performance is not good, but the fact is that they hired most of them for IOS developer profile and they shifted to flutter and they dint have the requirement of IOS developers anymore, so they directly called all of them one day and *FIRED* On the same day, they suddenly scheduled a meeting for remaining interns and informed that internship ends today which was supposed to end in the month of June and joining is differed by 2 months. There was no prior information regarding this. **And I never got a joining date till now** To conclude: Money minded and selfish people (mainly CEO) Abusive culture is encouraged CTO have no knowledge and try to be over smart CEO always manipulate things and fool people No Ethics **Please think twice before joining this company.**

avatar
Nuclei Response
4y
Hi - This is Ankur. I am really sorry that we made you feel this way. Obviously there is a lot to learn for me and I definitely want to learn from my past mistakes and become a better leader. April last year was a very uncertain period - for the whole world, let alone the Indian economy, banking vertical, startups, etc. Whole world went into a lock-down and there were talks about doomsday scenarios everywhere. We were no different. As a company, we had to take decisions which would be in the long term interest and help the company survive (and keep the team employed) in the long run. While doing that, we were clear about a few aspects, 1. We will not lay off people for financial reasons. We did not institute a fixed salary cut across the board or lay-off a big % of the team like many other companies did last year. Our intent was to keep the team together and sacrifice together, so as to come out stronger - together! We asked people above a certain salary band to take a voluntary salary cut and compensated them with twice the value in ESARs at a 50% discount. Those ESARs are very valuable today. Obviously Adarsh and I took 80% salary cut from March to Nov 2020. For everyone else, we started rolling back salary cuts from Aug'20 onwards and returned back to normal salaries from Oct'20 as revenue returned back to normal as well. 2. Right person for the right role. This has been our motto since late 2019. Pandemic or no pandemic, we believe that we have to stay true & fair to the team and long term goals of the company. That also means finding people who are the right fit for us. We want to work with smart, hard working yet humble people. Build a high trust culture based on freedom and respect. Yet sometimes even high performers / amazing people do not fit into a team for various reasons. So, even though we decided to not lay off for financial reasons, we continued taking decisions on the basis of fitment into the team, and had to ask 8/39 interns to leave. In hindsight, could we have communicated this better? Of course yes. And that's one big mistake from 2020. 3. Focus on the long term During the lock down, we wanted to focus primarily on getting back to normal asap. And that required the team to be focused on getting our house in order. We decided to absorb 12/39 interns who were already working in immediate revenue generating teams and deferred the joining dates of 19 interns at the time. **We did not lay them off.** 11/19, got other jobs in the next few months and by Jan'21 we had absorbed the 8 remaining. All 19 got placed within a few months. We tried to help everyone as best as we could to find other jobs and they all got placed into other companies. Obviously their college TPOs, friends & family helped. Given the difficult year we all have had - where we have all lost either family members or friends - I just want to put things in perspective. Jobs of all the people we deferred were secure, we just pushed the joining date back by a few months. I am sorry that we could not do justice with everyone and surely we made a lot of mistakes too. But that's the journey of constant learning we are on. We could have definitely handled the situation better and communicated better for sure. We have definitely learnt from the experience and have handled such delicate situations with much more care since then. Our team is our core product. Just like while building a new product, we make mistakes, rectify them and make the product better. At Nuclei, we are also on the same journey. We are constantly striving to make our team better and develop process / programs which will help the team become better. Whether it is the 25% team ownership of the company (sharing the wealth created with the team), various learning sessions we organise or the Friday 2nd half we keep aside for self-learning. We (the whole team including the CTO and CEO) are not perfect, far from it. But we are constantly trying to become a better version of ourselves. We are trying our best to provide freedom to each and every individual in the company to execute to the best of their abilities. But freedom also brings along a lot of responsibilities. Those who thrive while taking on more responsibilities, will definitely thrive at Nuclei.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 124 Reviews

Glassdoor has 145 Nuclei reviews submitted anonymously by Nuclei employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Nuclei is right for you.