Partners Group Reviews

3.4

48% would recommend to a friend

(475 total reviews)

David Layton

59% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Partners Group has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 475 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Partners Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

475 reviews
2.0
14 Jun 2018

Focus on the share price. Poor culture.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's easy to get a good amount of deal experience. Lot of young colleagues, so you will make friends for life! Strong reputation in Switzerland. Theoretical chance to relocate to other offices, but it depends what team you're in and if there is a demand elsewhere. I'd say this is one of the pros for the operations teams where employees can go to Asia for a few months or years. Pay is ok, but don't expect a top salary. Still ok though if you do a good job and your line managers like you. Nice corporate parties and events overall. The associate program is pretty good for those who want to work with investments but are unsure of where to go. It's annoying that you get paid in shares that are locked in, but the share price has been steadily going up.

Cons

Rather bad office culture: PG relies a lot on management of fear. Going to work everyday means fearing to be penalized, yelled at and treated like crap. I don't know about any other serious investment firm with such a high employee turnover rate (sub-VP, because from VP onwards you are too locked in), and a lot of that is due to this. Apparently, this is much worse in the Zug office where the work/life balance is zero and the rules even stricter! The firm's primary focus is to maximize the share price (c 50% of the shares held by employees; c 25-30% by the founders), which is done by focusing 100% on fundraising. If you're in an investment team, you will work more hours for same or less pay vs the fundraising teams, and face an investment committee that most of the time has no experience from making a direct investment (at least not within your field). PG is not known to be the best investor in the industry, which the management seems to be fine with. Very bureaucratic. The back- and middle-offices are huge and keep implementing new procedures and processes all the time, and the firm culture stipulates that you know all of these by heart. It's very cumbersome to get things done unfortunately. You probably need to be in the Zug office if you want to make sure to have a decent career in the firm. And you don't want to be in the Zug office more than a few days per year. Extremely hierarchical with a lot of steps before partner level. Every department has two co-heads plus two co-heads per sub-team and probably a few heads and co-heads below them. If you're not a co-head of something, you will be seen as a nobody. Let's put it this way, I would not like to be a woman in that firm. As one can see, there are exceptionally few women in leading positions, even for a firm in the finance industry.

1.0
1 Apr 2012

avoid like the plague

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Has a good reputation externally Excellent place for Swiss people Good for people that need micro managing, rigid structures and processes in place to perform well. Good for people that have a bland personality, do not believe in original thought and thus are happy to turn into robots and allow only super senior input to count.

Cons

New entrants are rarely pitched at the right level for their skills and experience. Many of the mid-level management lack the skills and experience to manage a diverse range of non-Swiss people. No work life balance for the new recruits, having a social life breeds resentment. There is a culture of how long one can sit at their desk as no one wants to be the first person to leave the office. There is a clear division between people that have been at the company for a long time and newer recruits, new recruits are not easily assimilated. The new recruits are seen as a threat and quickly sidelined especially if they join the company with more skills and experience which is very likely.

1.0
28 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At least it has improved support functions recently and surveyed employees for a pulse check, which actually revealed lots of ugly aspects of the company i.e. no link between performance and comp, overall low comp, mediocre managers, toxic Swiss culture etc etc

Cons

Sub industry compensation with a super long vesting period on both shares and carries Very limited promotion opportunities after AVP. It could take more than 5 years to get promoted Do not penalize managers who had affairs within organisations, which sort of encourage same pratices among employees? Very weak HR team - never reply to emails or calls. They are the busiest in the company Force employees to go to the office during pandemic without any insurance

Viewing 1 - 3 of 475 Reviews

Glassdoor has 567 Partners Group reviews submitted anonymously by Partners Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Partners Group is right for you.