Prove Reviews

3.8

72% would recommend to a friend

(76 total reviews)
avatar

Rodger Desai

87% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

Prove has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 76 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Prove employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

76 reviews
3.0
1 Nov 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Prove has seen good growth

Cons

Prove needs to create new products

avatar
Prove Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback! As we continue to grow and evolve as a Company we understand the importance of continuing to focus on our roadmap. The Executive Team are currently focusing on our 2024 Strategy and OKRs, which will be shared in due course. If you do have any further feedback you would like to share, please do not hesitate to reach out to your People Partner - continuous feedback is important to us! Thank you
2.0
18 Jun 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The product keeps hundreds of millions of people's accounts secure. It makes the world a better place. A lot of really nice, fun, talented people. Office socialization is great. If you're in one of the offices you will make friends and have regular onsite and offsite interaction. Internal documentation effort over the last year was incredible. Portal now exists for customers and internal employees with fantastic resources. Business outlook for this year is A+. Work life balance can be amazing depending on the team you're on. There are a lot of really happy people at Prove doing work that they love every day.

Cons

Disclaimer: Your happiness at this company is luck of the draw. I was unlucky. The engineering department has a few products. The main ones being their core cash-cow service and a couple experimental services. The cash cow is understaffed--when I was there it was four total developers in the US for an API that did all of the revenue of the company. Expect to always be available to support this product. Expect to be asked to make changes to this product and its supporting microservices at a moments notice with sometimes needing to be deployed the next day. Expect to test on production with live bank traffic. Expect banks to use APIs incorrectly but then management to not push back against the banks and instead expect you to make your APIs more permissive since they're such big customers. Three developers have left that project since bonuses. Also, deploys are done at 11pm twice a month and a stubborn director actually kept people awake until 4:30am in Spring 2022 for one of these deploys--this director has since been demoted as this company started hemorrhaging people directly because of them. The cash cow has no opportunities for growth and it's an incredibly difficult to maintain platform because the original architect "did not believe in frameworks" meaning that things like serialization and deserialization are hand rolled--all new development is being done the "right" way and the technical lead is doing a great job breaking through this mess. There is a mountain of technical debt that is being addressed by developers in Poland. The product road map for this project is constantly shifting and was never longer than 2-4 weeks in the entire time I was there. Two of the "experimental" platforms literally generate $0 combined, yet they get the best talent and are always made sure to be staffed. Difficult now as they continue to lose employees due to lack of viability--C-Suite had mentioned they were thinking about using block chain in one of them (a death knell for product viability). There are process problems. Everything is stuck behind enormous amounts of red tape. Imagine owning services and being asked to debug them but not being allowed access to production logs? You cannot deploy your own code. Your code is deployed by an ops team and requires a ticketing process with 24h advanced approval from 5 different leaders across engineering, infosec, ops, product, etc. If you want to test a change on your staging environment that is not customer facing you need approval from 5 different engineering leaders. To get something from your local to production generally takes a full business week for even the lowest (or zero!) volume services because of scheduling conflicts for the few people in ops that are taking on an unbelievable workload. There are nepotism problems. For example, two employees are childhood best friends and one is a large problem and reports to the other who makes all criticism about the lower-ranking one go away despite there being a mountain of it. I've been DM'd by someone else asking "do you have a personal problem with me?" after making public suggestions to process; the team clearly didn't own this process it was this single employee. A very political and hostile workplace from a few bad actors. Engineering leadership has obsession with every manager being extremely technical however most of the problems solved at Prove are very easy. They require simple solutions that align with what compliance and infosec want. Engineering leadership is obsessed with architecture discussions to the point where many employees believe they intentionally make things difficult because being seen as clever is more important to them than deploying something practical. The other departments? Finance refuses to hire the proper engineering head count for this company. This is a "tech" company of over 300 people but the headcount for IC engineers may be less thank 30? Also, prepare to pay for your own development tools, like Intellij. Product can't figure out what they want to build and not that it matters anyway they don't have nearly the engineering headcount they need to get anything done. Sales? They seem to be killing it. Go sales!

avatar
Prove Response
3y
Thank you for this feedback - we are very sorry to hear about your experience during your time at Prove. Our Technology Team is continuously evolving and we are committed to actively addressing issues as and when they arise. Most recently, this has included a review of our structure, processes, and tools. We appreciate this may take some time but we are confident that we have made progress in the past month through the realignment of our teams, provision of correct licenses for tools, and clarification of our strategic focus in order to address growth gaps and single points of failure. We are fully committed to continuous improvement. Additionally, we have enhanced our People Team to provide dedicated support to the Technology function. We are also rolling out various learning and development, finalizing competencies, and refining our level and title structure in order to ensure all employees have a meaningful and fulfilling career with Prove. We appreciate your feedback and if you have any additional comments or would like to speak to someone about your experiences please feel free to contact the team at feedbackeb@prove.com — The People Partner Team
1.0
20 Oct 2023

A Sad Decline Over the Last Year

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The current CRO has (at most) three to six months left before he is forced out. The discontent of veteran team members has inspired others to speak out to try and change things before they get even worse. There are a few people here who still care deeply about the success of this company.

Cons

Just over a year ago, the new CRO introduced himself with the mantra "One team. One dream." In that time, he has failed to live up even to those trite expectations. He quickly flooded Prove with his Twilio pals, fractured the sales team in the worst re-org I have ever seen, and severed lines of communication between Sales, CS, and Solutions Engineers. Under his leadership, the managers he has hired have forced half-baked and poorly implemented processes onto a team that formerly enjoyed considerable success and tight camaraderie. The company seemingly expected "big things" to happen under his leadership. It's difficult to see why they would have thought that considering his inexperience and lack of acumen. An early warning sign was the compensation plan. Prove broke with a long-standing practice of rewarding sellers for big deals in favor of a complicated mess designed to limit payments. The compensation plan for Sales Directors has gotten dramatically worse under this CRO. Even worse, the company does not pay out money when it is owed. Sellers who have closed deals are continually frustrated because revenue ops, sales leadership, and finance conspire to cheat employees out of timely commission and bonus payments. The CRO, revenue ops, and finance are also unable to produce a compensation plan in a timely fashion or modify the existing one to correct known problems. The company seems to ignore long-time employees who have a track record of success in favor of recruiting outsiders (or, rather, Twilio insiders) as managers who turn out to be all sizzle and no steak. After it becomes apparent that they're nothing more than a flash-in-the-pan, they linger like the stale smell of burnt fat that permeates a room. Apparently, the only way for a manager to get fired is for them to have a debilitating substance use disorder or to just not show up to do their job. A big reason for these problems is many of the managers on the sales team simply have little understanding of Prove's products or services. And they absolutely do not understand the kind of collaborative culture and go-getter attitude that made this team successful early on. Some actively encourage pushing narratives about the company's solutions that are borderline unethical due to chronic problems in the product team delivering promised updates. Others make unilateral changes or insert themselves into larger discussions without understanding the issue or problems that they are trying to address. Even worse, these same managers often betray their direct reports to score points with the CRO. Leadership and management also change processes and internal toolsets so frequently that it makes it impossible to establish a good working cadence and flow. They suffer from wishful thinking, believing that the next tool, the next piece of software is going to solve all their problems. Instead, the constant rip-and-replace of tools makes it more difficult for anybody to do their job effectively. Another reviewer said the CRO thinks we sell widgets and not an enterprise software solution. At first, I didn't see it that way. But it really does explain some of the changes he's made. Twilio is, effectively, a digital widget that does some basic stuff. It's a commodity. Prove is not. Prove should be sold as sophisticated enterprise-level software that is solving big problems for premier financial institutions and other industry leaders. Because the CRO has a widget mindset, it explains why he accepts no dissent and, on a recent call, wanted "no debate" as to the way we should be approaching our sales. He does not view us as consultative experts but rather as factory workers on an assembly line pumping out widgets. The CRO’s solution to these problems that he has created is, apparently, to shift blame to individual sellers, solutions engineers, and CSMs. He seems to think MORE managers and MORE useless tools are a solution to the team’s discontent and underperformance. It boggles the mind when there isn’t a single team that has met its goals and many managers do not understand the markets their teams are selling into. Recently, the HR team rolled out a training for the EMPLOYEES to learn how to get more out of 1:1s. The 1:1s aren’t the problem. The terrible management IS. A motivated and effective sales team should not need this much “management.” It simply shows how poorly this company has hired over the last year and how much it has suffered from attrition due to the loss of senior and experienced sellers. It is no wonder why Prove has lost a significant portion of its top talent to other emerging companies in the space. Anyone who dreams this is "one team" must be fast asleep.

avatar
Prove Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We are disappointed to hear about your experiences and how you feel particularly with the focus on the management team. We have recently completed our Q3 Pulse survey and conducted focus groups with every department to provide an opportunity to hear feedback and suggestions on how we can continue to improve employee experience at Prove. Your continuous feedback is important to us. May I suggest that you reach out to discuss your feedback in more detail to the People Partner team, we would love the opportunity to discuss this with you. Thank you.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 76 Reviews

Glassdoor has 83 Prove reviews submitted anonymously by Prove employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Prove is right for you.