employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Utah Community Action

Is this your company?

Utah Community Action Reviews

3.5

59% would recommend to a friend

(117 total reviews)

Jennifer Godfrey

74% approve of CEO

58% positive business outlook

Utah Community Action has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 117 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Utah Community Action employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

117 reviews
1.0
5 Nov 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Serving Utah's low income families is a worthy cause.

Cons

Erin Trenbeath-Murray, who designated herself as CEO when she was installed to replace the outgoing executive director retired. The other reviews on here are accurate with regards to her and her "leadership" team, which consists of her personal cronies and favorite pet employees. Within a few months of taking over, she scrapped many of the old SLCAP programs, such as Home Retention and advocacy. Erin also fired many Weatherization employees, as well as some HR people she felt were loyal to the prior director. Her cronies then lied and told the family advocates that they would be phased out in 2-3 years, and then proceeded to get rid of all those positions in one year. She then placed many of her favorite Head Start workers in HEAT and Housing, even if they had no experience in those areas. Erin and her cronies overwork their rank and file employees and the lead teachers are overburdened. They do not listen to their employees' concerns of needs, and instead "lead" through fear and intimidation. It is a terrible workplace environment. Other non-profit agencies recognize that this place went downhill when Trenbeath-Murray took over. By the way, they recently changed their name to Utah Community Action. Apparently, they believe that a name change is easier than actually enacting positive change and fostering a healthy environment. I would not recommend this place to my worst enemy.

1.0
23 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Getting to work with children and low-income families who are in great need of assistance. In my case, working with many refugee families was enjoyable to me.

Cons

I would strongly suggest not working for this agency. The turnover rate is incredibly high, because of the constant stress/confusion in the work environment. From what I understand, 1/4 of lead teachers quit during the school year, many of whom just up and left without providing notice to the agency. I believe many more will quit over the summer landing the organization back at "square one" having to train all-new employees, etc. Job expectations are often unclear/delayed/unrealistic - this job is much, much more than teaching preschool. It's absolutely too much! The Head Start portion of SLCAP is always understaffed and seems management heavy, which causes a lot of problems. There aren't enough supervisors to teach "Lead Teachers/Family Advocates" how to do their jobs effectively. It is also hard to get a response from other departments Lead Teachers are required to coordinate with closely, because they too are understaffed. For instance, the nursing team, composed of 3 nurses, is now down to 1. (With a caseload of over 2,000 children program-wide.) One nurse quit this year and the lead nurse is retiring. Another newly hired nurse quit after just 4 hours. 2 kitchen staff walked off the job, 3 Education Specialists (supervisors to the teachers) quit mid-year and atleast one office manager also quit. Burnout is quickly cause by staff members who work constantly but still never feel like they are getting everything done. The work environment is chaotic and extremely toxic, as the CEO and management team communicate passive-aggressively and aren't transparent in regards to what is going on with the organization. The organization undergoes constant change, given its requirement to comply with federal guidelines/constant need for more grant money, which may or may not be awarded. These items also contribute to high stress levels and a chaotic atmosphere.

1.0
11 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Head Start and CAP are both great causes that have helped thousands of people across the Salt Lake Valley. The provide services nobody else does and the staff that deals directly with the 'clients' are the most outstanding, caring people you will ever come across. They TRULY care about the outcomes and their role in achieving those outcomes. The program, as it's meant to work, is superb.

Cons

The Management staff. The director has zero business running across the road, much less running this business unchecked. Sure she has a great background in education. But it stops there. She is so far removed from the cause of the organization that she couldn't run it effectively. She not only has no people skills (unless there is a camera around), but she repels staff and those who work under her - with the exception of the directors she's surrounded herself with. They have a GREAT time - on Head Start's dime. The things I've seen on the back-end as to where they spend money would make every grant be pulled immediately if they weren't so good at covering tracks. SO sad that they run this like their own personal club - even using the food services department to cater personal parties and some directors use the Head Start classroom as their own personal daycare (who cares if it causes one less child in need to take that spot). It's disgusting and we all wish the board would look past the engaging smile of the director and find out what they've really been doing.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 117 Reviews

Glassdoor has 118 Utah Community Action reviews submitted anonymously by Utah Community Action employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Utah Community Action is right for you.