I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 months. I interviewed at Deel in Feb 2025
Interview
Rigorous, includes take home assignment. Final interview with one of the three heads of product was short and intense - definitely a vibe fit more than anything. Clear from everyone I met that the culture is chaotic and ambitious, which unfortunately fits with the espionage revelation.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Deel uses a home task as a second stage for PM interviews to evaluate your readiness for working here. The key goal of this task is to evaluate your problem-solving approach within the framework of "Deel Speed" - emphasizing your capacity to strike the right balance between quick but
meaningful research and confidently making decisions and assumptions in the face of imperfect data
7 rounds of interviews, with a case study solving a live problem. Confirmed that I cleared all the rounds, got me to give them 2 references. Then suddenly went quiet, and came back saying they gave the offer to someone who took the role at a more junior position
Phone screening, hiring manager, case interviews. All pretty straight forward with no trick question. Went through CV and experience as well as motivations for the role. Talked about relevant experiences to the role requirements.
I went through four rounds of interviews for a Product role at Deel. The process started well and was well-structured at first, but the experience deteriorated over time.
After investing significant time preparing and presenting a detailed case study (which was described as “excellent”), I still had to constantly follow up to move to the next steps. The final interview suffered from technical issues, poor communication and the interviewer in a noisy environment, which made it feel rushed and unprofessional.
What stood out the most, however, was the complete lack of respect for candidates’ time. Despite committing to provide a decision by a specific date (after I mentioned having another offer), the recruiting team simply went silent. I had to chase for updates several times, and even after being rejected, no actual feedback was provided, just a generic message and empty promises to follow up that were never fulfilled.
It’s disappointing to see a company that promotes a “remote-first” and “people-first” culture treat candidates this way. The process felt one-sided, with little regard for the time and effort candidates invest.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The case study was imagining you're a PM for Google and the company sees google workspace as a cost center and not an investment opportunity
How would you use PLG levers to convince management to invest in the further development