The process consists of several interviews that lay the focus on technical experience, cultural fit and general Q&A. A highlight is the training day (including a programming task) where both sides can get to know each other at a much deeper level than just from a face-to-face talk.

Had the first initial interview over skype then follow up technical interview(over skype) and then i received feedback from the company where reasons given for not continuing with me where: -"Problem with communication" - no explanation what that means, technology failures as we had a problem connecting earlier? i was too quite? Did my explanations/concepts not make sense? - "His initial question was regarding the our legacy infrastructure and if we plan to migrate to framework there. This as a question alone is not a red flag, but during the next hour he left impression of a person who thinks in a framework world only" I was told there is a legacy code that was coded a while ago and i would assume legacy means its old, it will need changing at some point and if they are any plans to move it to a framework since a vast of the website on the front-end plus other functionality are running on symfony framework. - "We haven't touched anything except tech, but he seems tech-only focused." The interview was a technical interview, so i was shocked this came back as feedback on why they didn't continue with me, should i have asked non technical questions in a technical interview? The whole interview process left me with more questions than answers, sent them an email seeking clarity and still waiting for feedback. I would say its a not so good experience because of the feedback given to me as you can see with some of the feedback above. I feel this feedback was created on the fly and didn't really reflect how i did in that interview.