The interview process was efficient and professional. I was impressed with everyone I met. It included a performance task and 3 interview rounds. After the last round, I was notified that the other person got the role. I was told in a professional, kind, and prompt manner. They then reached out to me a month later to interview me for another role. Overall a great process!

Multiple interviews and required hiring exercise that took a few hours to complete. There were many red flags about the job/culture throughout the process. I was sent slides about the orgs mission and one goal was work/life balance. But then, during the last round of interviews they stressed how 60hour work weeks should be expected-but "take breaks"! Honestly, after the last interview I had some major concerns about the position that I was planning to follow up on if I was offered the role. However, after the time investment (approx. 9hrs/multiple weeks) I was then "ghosted" and never received any follow up. I learned that I was not being offered the role by logging into their hiring platform and seeing that may application had been "saved for future opportunities". Overall, not a great experience-but a personal relief as I have had enough of toxic workplace cultures that place value on employees working until burned out-while simultaneously preaching about work/life balance. I'd suggest applying elsewhere.

The hiring manager was prompt in reaching out to me after applying. The first round was a quick 30 min phone call that was friendly and upbeat. I was then passed on to a second round where I had to turn in a document replying to a couple of scenarios and how I would handle them. Although I unfortunately didn't make it to the last two rounds (Zoom interview) my experience was ok. I see why they might want an example like the scenario, but it also did seem a bit superfluous and unrelated.