The recruiter gave me a 60 min code test without clearly telling me the evaluation is based on compilation. Finished them in time, even spent time writing clear comments to make the code clean and readable, expecting a human would read it and see the code quality. Instead, got rejected simply because they didn't pass compilation. If that is the requirement, they should have told this up front, so I would have focus on testing compilation instead of code quality.
3 45 min rounds virtual, mix of technical data structures and algorithms style questions and behavioral questions. Around leetcode medium difficulty, strings and array based. Short talk about what the team does.
2 Technical Coding Screen, followed by onsite. Interesting problems and role related. Friendly recruiting coordinator. On site - in person, several rounds, includes presentation and question & answers. Highly role related and based on past experiences.
Remembering the coding question about finding a peak element gives me a sense of relief. It was nearly the same as one I had practiced on PracHub a few days prior. The interview process began with a recruiter screening my resume, followed by a technical phone interview where we discussed data structures and algorithms. The onsite included two additional rounds focusing on coding and behavioral questions. Overall, the experience was straightforward, and I felt well-prepared, ultimately leading to an offer that I happily accepted.