The interview process was disappointing and felt largely one-sided. Instead of asking meaningful questions to learn about my qualifications and experience, the manager spent much of the conversation talking about himself and his accomplishments. Very little time was spent discussing the actual responsibilities of the role, expectations, or opportunities for growth, leaving me with many unanswered questions. Throughout the interview, the manager repeatedly emphasized how much the staff liked him and how well he managed the team, rather than focusing on whether I would be a good fit for the position. During the interview and later while visiting the location, I personally felt there was favoritism toward employees from certain backgrounds, specifically those from the Dominican Republic or Puerto Rico. While this was my perception, it contributed to my concern that employees may not all be treated equally. Overall, the interview felt like a waste of time because I left with very little understanding of the position and the impression that the manager was not genuinely interested in evaluating candidates or providing meaningful information about the job. I believe Human Resources should review and improve the interview process. Having a corporate recruiter participate in interviews, establishing a minimum interview length of 45 minutes, ensuring candidates receive a thorough overview of the role, and providing feedback after the interview would create a more professional, consistent, and transparent hiring experience.