The people were nice and I felt like we had great conversations throughout the process. However, I was denied due to “not asking enough questions about what they do” which left me very confused because I asked questions at the end of every interview.
They have you go through three rounds of an onsite process and even if you perform well there’s no guarantee of an offer. What frustrated me most is that there was no intro call with the recruiter beforehand to set expectations, discuss the company, or understand what they were really looking for. Going into three rounds without that context put me at a disadvantage from the start.
It felt like they were looking for a very specific type of candidate but never communicated that until after the fact. Overall the process felt unbalanced and the feedback didn’t match the experience I had in the interviews
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Tremendous in Mar 2026
Interview
Recruiter Screen, HM interview, Take home interview
I got to the 2nd round but was declined after the take home. I was told the emphasis would be on my writing skill. I did spend a good amount of time on this assignment but was unable to clear this round. Good luck to anyone who goes through this process. It is unclear as to what they are looking for or why my take home was insufficient.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell me about a project you are proud of, how you handled conflict.
Started with a call with a recruiter, who was very pleasant. Followed up with another technical screen that was a simple non-Leetcode-style question. Then moved onto the take-home/final interview which was to design a solution to a technical problem and then implement the solution in multiple phases throughout the "virtual onsite."
The process itself was straightforward and I appreciate not having to do contrived Leetcode-style exercises to complete the interview process, but the take-home question is poorly designed. They frame the technical problem with language that suggests that the purpose of the exercise is to explore your problem solving and technical solutioning experience, but in reality it felt much more like they wanted a very specific solution and for you to have arrived at that same solution with no input on their end.
The problem does give you ample room to demonstrate your decision-making process, but ultimately it feels like they just want to see you arrive at the same conclusions that they would internally, which gives off-putting vibes to me.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
Implement a fuzzy search/ranking algorithm in Ruby