Artera Reviews

3.3

50% would recommend to a friend

(155 total reviews)
avatar

Guillaume de Zwirek

55% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Artera has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 155 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Artera employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

155 reviews
1.0
9 Jun 2020

Biased and Toxic work culture/environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Decent product with great scalability - My small 5 team department was very diverse

Cons

-Very obvious shill reviews on Glassdoor. Notice how all the positive 5 star reviews of this company are all done by members when they were actively working at the company! The negative reviews on Glassdoor are definitely more true to the WELL experience than the shilly positive reviews. -It's true that negative feedback was suppressed from previous employees after they were fired as part of their deal to keep their severance package. A tactic to suppress the honest voice of victims. - Leadership is accountable for systemic racism present at this company. Notice how the company picture has more dogs than POC. The caption reads "Well loves Dogs" (more so than POCs). I raised the lack of diversity multiple times (with that company picture being one of those instances), with leadership, with actionable steps that can be taken immediately to help make the company more diverse and feel more inclusive. Even after securing better opportunities at other companies I still addressed this issue to leadership, through emails, presentations and exit interviews. The repeated deliberate ignorance and dismissal from leadership on these issues definitely lead one to question the potential racial bias leadership might hold in this company. -Favoritism in play with the people going to office hours with the CEO the most, often getting the promotions. The individuals getting these promotions were overwhelmingly white males. - Lack of opportunities for women + POCs to advance Fired about a 1/3 of the company due to a "restructuring". 80% of those let go were either women or POC or both. The highest performing rep(at the time) was a female that was let go. Other lower performing male reps remained on the same team or given the option to work in different departments. The overwhelming majority of the people subsequently brought in were white males. -High Turnover Rate. After leaving this company, the 4 remaining members of my team also left in the coming months. Cases of turnover rose especially after the restructuring. -CEO has been notified numerous times through anonymous surveys and feedback that he is not approachable, even with office hours, employees still did not feel comfortable reaching out to him. -Toxic employees are given a platform to spew harmful insensitive jokes with no repercussions. Ex. An employee known for insensitive remarks has a joke to the whole company during a Friday standup w/ an onsite interviewee in attendance. This toxic employee prefaced the entire company that the joke was a joke she shouldn't be saying but then proceeded to say the joke claiming she had "cleared it", which was false. This employee then delivered the insensitive joke, with awkward laughter. At that moment leadership should have taken the initiative and condemn the actions done by this employee. Realizing that leadership wouldn't do anything, I took it upon myself to address this toxic employee, that is about double my age, why her actions are deplorable, and have no place in modern society, let alone a workplace.

avatar
Artera Response
5y
At WELL, we accept responsibility for areas where can be better, particularly when it comes to diversity and inclusion. We are in an unprecedented time in the world, and many of us are understanding for the first time the extent to which BIPOCs are discriminated against. Like many others, our eyes have been opened. It is clear that this intern did not experience our culture as inclusive as he or she wanted. Despite that it is only one voice, we are using it as an opportunity to learn and improve. The feedback this individual references was presented to our CEO on the last day of their employment over a year ago, so this person did not have the chance to see our actions put into motion, nor did they have the opportunity to directly see and/or contribute to the positive change since that time. Our response is coming many months after this post because we struggled in balancing our desire to give them (and the entire BLM movement) a voice, while ensuring prospective employees are hearing facts as well as judgements. Many of the claims made by this individually appear to be “worst case conclusions” by an individual who was disgruntled in the workplace. WHERE WE AGREE: Diversity. WELL is not a poster child of representation, we have struggled to recruit BIPOCs particularly in Santa Barbara. We continue to experiment with strategies and have been most successful with hosting diversity events and partnering with HBCU. WHERE WE DISAGREE: Shill reviews. We have never solicited positive reviews from anyone in the company. As with all review sites, what you see on glassdoor represents the extremes. Suppressing feedback. We acknowledged in a past response that we do include standard mutual non-disparagement agreements as part of our severance packages. We have also addressed this with our entire company during a Monday stand-up for complete transparency. Mutual non-disparagement contractually restricts WELL and the former employee from speaking negatively about the other party. While this agreement is required to get paid severance, receiving severance is a choice each individual makes, and allows us to offer compensation above and beyond what is owed to help individuals during their transition. This is standard practice for companies and we think it is a good practice. Correlation between office hours and promotions. WELL handles promotions through a structured performance review process in which HR, the executive leadership team, and managers all calibrate to ensure promotions are equitable across all departments in the company. As in any company, individuals who go above and beyond in their performance advance quicker than those simply doing the minimum. There is no direct correlation between attending the CEO’s office hours and receiving a promotion. Systemic racism. The photograph in question used to be on our careers page, where we (among many other things) touted the benefit of being a dog-friendly office. That picture has since been removed on private request from this reviewer who did not want their picture on our website. The insinuation that we terminated more women and people of color in our January 2019 reduction is a 100% false statement. While in no ways intentional, our diversity actually improved as a result of the reduction. Voluntary turnover. WELL has less than 7% voluntary turnover. The individuals this poster references were a group of interns. Platform for Toxic Culture. This poster recommends a strategy of public condemnation. We do not agree with this approach. We choose to handle sensitive issues privately so we can appropriately teach and coach individuals on the value of playing as a team. Hypocrisy. This individual is referring to a post on our company LinkedIn page on 06/05/2020 in support of Black Lives Matter, where we expressed our solidarity and further committed to matching donations. We ended up donating over $20,000 to BLM causes. We believed it was better to speak and act than stay silent. We accept the challenge by this reviewer to do even better. To this reviewer – we are sorry you didn’t feel heard, and we wish you had the chance to see how much we took your feedback to heart, and the many activities we have already undertaken to become a more representative company. We do not regret posting in support of BLM and we will continue to work towards a more diverse and inclusive workplace. We have room to grow, and we welcome your continued feedback from the periphery.
2.0
18 May 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Get hired out of college -Get promoted quickly by playing your cards right -Bar in basement is cool -Walking distance to downtown restaurants and night life -Great platform that truly helps patients connect to their healthcare providers.

Cons

-“The loudest voice is seldom the wisest”...Not at WELL, noise overrides truth. -Lack of positive reinforcement from leadership, but rather fear based tactics -Leadership is tainted with favoritism and politics -Lacking Diversity of Color & Thought -Must drink the kool-aid, and play politics to prosper -Not a safe space to speak out, don’t express your intelligence if it’s not aligned with status quo (aka politics) -Culture is made up of deceit, hypocrisy and favoritism -The previous poor reviews are accurate, namely, upon leaving the contract is not a two-way non-disparaging agreement.

2.0
27 Dec 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

+Willingness to hire people into entry-level roles with limited or no experience. Entry-level employees can also move into different opportunities within the organization. +Great product that is truly revolutionizing healthcare and the patient experience. +Unlimited PTO, generous Healthcare Benefits, opportunities to volunteer and give back to the community.

Cons

-Leadership opportunities for women are limited. The first and only woman in leadership was hired several years after founding. In tech, where perception is reality, the perception is that the c-suite is a Silicon Valley boy’s club. -Play their games or pack up and go home. Unless you are willing to play politics and keep your opinions to yourself, you won’t move up at the company. Personal relationships are valued over relevant experience. -New managers are left to figure it out for themselves. There is no training system for people without managerial experience. No formal training, no informal training. These incompetent managers, of no fault of their own, breed incompetence in their direct reports and so on. -Despite what anyone says, there is no work life balance. The standard communicated by leadership is to measure someone’s value by how much of their sanity they devote to the company. It is an arms race with no winners—just burnt out cynics.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 155 Reviews

Glassdoor has 162 Artera reviews submitted anonymously by Artera employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Artera is right for you.