Artsy Reviews

The team is largely in the 25–35 age range, but what stands out is that many managers have been there for 8–10 years and haven’t worked anywhere else. This creates a bit of an echo chamber, where there’s limited perspective from outside the company and not much evolution in how things are done. Engagement across teams is quite low. A lot of people seem checked out, and there isn’t much effort from management to change that. Managers, in my experience, don’t appear particularly invested in their teams’ development or wellbeing. One of the more difficult aspects is that a lot of decisions and opportunities seem to revolve around favoritism rather than merit. This makes it hard to feel motivated or recognized for your work. Overall, it might suit someone early in their career who prefers a more relaxed environment, but if you’re looking for strong leadership, professional growth, and a merit-based culture, this probably isn’t the place.

The contrast between the 1-star and 5-star reviews speaks volumes. Many of the 5-star posts include "cons" that are oddly phrased to still sound positive — a clear sign of spin rather than substance. It’s disappointing to see what feels like an effort to dilute genuine feedback. Artsy, if transparency is truly and still a core value, it should be practiced — not just promoted.