employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Construction Journal

Is this your company?

Construction Journal Reviews

2.2

19% would recommend to a friend

(78 total reviews)

Rich Goldman

19% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

Construction Journal has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 78 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Construction Journal employee rating is 43% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

78 reviews
1.0
15 Jun 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have covered parking so your car doesn't heat up in the sun. That's pretty much it.

Cons

The entire company and the sales opportunity offered. You will go broke working for this company. If you are a person with a family and regular bills, don't even consider this. If your a kid living at home or share an apartment with 3 friends and looking for Friday night drink money and don't care about advancing in life. Well then this is your place.

1.0
9 Feb 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Casual dress code; easygoing work atmosphere; decent health benefits; easy to manage workload and get time off; work is fairly independent; convenient work hours (8-4:30).

Cons

Paychecks bounced; Some employees should have been fired for making the office a circus; Management was totally spineless; work is boring and monotonous; completely unrealistic salary ($24,000 a year plus incentives if you meet certain goals); no opportunity for advancement; totally dead-end job that no one would take if the economy was better; they record all your internet activity

2.0
1 Jul 2015

Data Clerk

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The environment is generally relaxed as long as you don't make an error. Some of the employees there are good people trying to make a living.

Cons

When I was offered the position I was told that I would be a full time employee. Unfortunately on my first day I was informed that I would be working for and compensated for 37.5 hours per week rather than 40. Many of the employees, especially the new, are working 37.5 hours per week. This is fair in the sense that Fair Labor Standards Act doesn't define "full time". Frequently the work load required more time than 7.5 hours per day. When this occurred I had to stay to finish my work past the 7.5 hours. If I left "on time" I would have been reprimanded for doing a poor job. I was never compensated for this extra time spent working because it wasn't "approved" by management. Clock in and clock out times are documented with a software program and a time sheet is generated for each pay period. Any time over 75 hours for 2 weeks work was not payed for. This is company wide. Performance was measured by my daily totals of emails sent, phone calls made, updates made, etc. against amounts set by management. Less than 10% of employees would meet or exceed the monthly totals expected. Those that did exceed were offered bonuses less than $100. I worked at Construction Journal for over 2 years and was not once offered a pay raise. I knew several other employees that had worked for over 4 years without a pay raise. Management doesn't perform performance reviews unless you are below your daily goals. I have heard about an employee requesting a pay raise after 3 years of working and was made to talk to the president of the company. The president told this employee that they weren't going to get a pay raise because they were not meeting their daily goals. There are many other grievances that I have with this company. I didn't burn my bridge when I left, but I will not return if I am unemployed.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 78 Reviews

Glassdoor has 78 Construction Journal reviews submitted anonymously by Construction Journal employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Construction Journal is right for you.