Crunchbase Reviews

2.7

32% would recommend to a friend

(117 total reviews)

Jager McConnell

39% approve of CEO

31% positive business outlook

Crunchbase has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 117 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Crunchbase employee rating is 30% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

117 reviews
5.0
28 May 2026

Supportive Culture and Meaningful Work

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’ve really enjoyed my experience working here. The culture is collaborative, supportive, and full of people who care about doing good work while also being good teammates. There’s a strong level of trust, while still feeling challenged and engaged. Being fully remote, I still feel strongly connected to my teammates. Leadership communicates transparently and is open to answering questions and listening to feedback. Our CEO, Jager, is very approachable and cares about the people and the success of the organization. Even in a fast-paced environment, people are willing to help each other and work through challenges together.

Cons

The environment can move quickly at times and priorities occasionally shift, but overall it’s been a positive place to continue to do meaningful work and work alongside talented people.

1.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people you work are generally helpful

Cons

This company lacks professionalism and respect for employees. A lot of people in charge were arrogant for no reason. It got tiring sitting through meetings where managers talked themselves up while employees were left dealing with stress and confusion. The horrible office politics made things worse because it seemed like being close to leadership mattered more than actually doing good work. People stopped speaking openly since feedback usually went nowhere or somehow got turned against you later. Why even try to stand out when favoritism decides everything anyway. Morale was low across almost every team, and you could tell a lot of employees were mentally checked out already. Conversations around the office started sounding forced because nobody really trusted each other anymore. One thing that really stood out was how disconnected leadership seemed from what employees were actually dealing with. Problems and concerns were brought out during meetings, and somehow the conversation always got redirected into corporate talk that solved nothing. A lot of employees ended up keeping their opinions to themselves because nobody wanted extra attention from management. The fake positivity around the office made everything more exhausting too, especially when everyone clearly knew morale was horrible. Even team events and group calls started feeling uncomfortable because there was always this pressure to act impressed by leadership no matter what was happening behind the scenes. The stressful part was watching hard workers slowly stop caring because their effort never really changed anything. Some employees handled extra tasks, yet the people getting recognition were usually the loudest ones in the room. There was also a strange amount of gossip and passive aggressive attitudes between teams, which made simple projects harder than they needed to be. Managers would talk about transparency, but important decisions were always hidden until the last second. A lot of people started leaving quietly, and nobody seemed surprised anymore when another resignation popped up. The company had smart and talented employees, but the culture made it difficult for people to stay motivated for long.

2.0
22 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote flexibility and solid benefits. Hardworking individuals

Cons

This is an ego-driven company filled with politics that stem from the very top. Leadership operates from a place of fear, and it shows in the decisions being made. It’s clearly a make-or-break year, and no one is thinking beyond the next quarter. One good quarter and leadership is on cloud nine; one bad quarter and everything shifts with emotionally charged, short-sighted decisions. There’s also a noticeable level of disdain toward employees. When the company underperforms, leadership is quick to blame teams, saying they can't adapt or meet expectations that have been unclearly set. Employee surveys have pointed to the same root issue: leadership. You can see most of the reviews from the past year have been negative. Overall, it’s an unstable environment with reactive leadership, heavy internal politics, and little confidence that meaningful change is coming.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 117 Reviews

Glassdoor has 122 Crunchbase reviews submitted anonymously by Crunchbase employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Crunchbase is right for you.