Péssima experiência profissional - Recruiter Adecco Employee Review

1.0
4 Oct 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Processo seletivo rápido, porém com falhas que resultou numa péssima experiência após contratação.

Cons

1. Atraso de pagamento de salário e VR do acordado; 2. Na entrevista a recrutadora não sabia informar sobre o os descontos de Plano de saúde, após a contratação o DP enviou um documento informando que o desconto para dependente era R$ 760,00 mensal por pessoa. 3. Fazem contratação CLT pra dar chute PJ, pois em letras miúdas e trambiques colocam em contrato apenas o número de lei que irá dizer que após desligamento, sem justa causa e antecedente ao prazo de determinado em contrato, eles não pagarão multa alguma então fujam, pois ganhar salário CLT e cumprir toda jornada de vínculo CLT pra levar chute PJ, não compensa; 4. Em caso de contrato terceirizado, não possuem acompanhamento algum, a empresa cliente realmente acaba sendo o acompanhamento principal e único; 5. NÃO SABEM RESPONDER NADA, parece que a empresa só tem profissionais com conhecimento nível estágio, porque nunca sabem sobre nada e até chegar nos fins de ter retorno, é um sofrimento conseguir falar com alguém da Adecco. 6. Fazem uso de discurso debochado, ainda que o colaborador esteja discursando com plena calma, paciência e educação; 7. Salário não competitivo; 8. RH só responde quando querem o que é benéfico para empresa; 9. Processo seletivo feito as pressas para não perderem um contrato de empresa multinacional, porém cheio de falhas e trambiques.

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
7 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's a good place to work.

Cons

Not the best experience or secure work

1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All