employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged employer

Agilent is a great company to work for, anytime. - Global Infrastructure Organization Agilent Technologies Employee Review

4.0
4 May 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The HP culture (if at all there is anything like that) seems to be talked about since this company is a spin-off from HP. It is one of the market leaders in the measurements equipments and life sciences. The work-life balance is great since they do allow people to work from home sometimes, for any personal chores that needs to be taken care of, from time to time. The company is known for its quality products that is used across several verticals (telecom, healthcare, semiconductor, etc.,). The company is heavily into offshore and outsourced model - one that has helped them to cut costs and maximize profits.

Cons

The company has recently cut some jobs in the hope of staying profitable especially in difficult times like these when the revenue has fallen more than expected. Though the job cuts recently were across the globe, needless to say, a major number has been in the high cost geographies (i.e US). The already shrinking IT and the global infrastructure organization has been cut down even more. Since the amount of projects continue to remain same or increase, and the workforce being decreased, this will put a lot of stress on the employees. Even though the senior management would've liked to be 'unperturbed' by the market turmoil, Agilent is facing the heat in recent months. Have to wait and see how Q2 plays out

Explore other reviews about Agilent Technologies

5.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good teammates, work life balance and salary

Cons

None i could think of

1.0
15 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great products that help scientific researchers

Cons

The enterprise comms dept is awful. A toxic environment marked by instability and burnout. Long‑time employees are pushed out, new hires leave, and the culture is defined by fear rather than collaboration. The core issue is the leadership. Limited enterprise‑level experience and a lack of emotional intelligence have created a culture of micro-managing, reactive decisions, and psychological insecurity. Instead of providing clarity and strategic leadership, the leader fuels confusion, distrust, and exhaustion. The result is a dysfunctional department where morale is low, workloads are unsustainable, and employees feel unsafe speaking up.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All