employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged employer

Death by PowerPoint - Technical Staff MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

2.0
17 Oct 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The association with MIT gives immediate credibility to the staff.

Cons

Interestingly the vast majority of staff are not MIT graduates. Lincoln Lab management is poor; groups are responsible for finding their own funding, so that research becomes subordinate to marketing. Expect to spend quite a bit of time using PowerPoint to put together presentations to attract sponsors, or work on many different projects at the whim of the group office. The previous director bought into the GE (Jack Welch) management philosophy, i.e., fire the bottom 10% and ignore the middle 80%. The current administration has not changed course significantly, These management policies are ill-suited for a research lab; it's best days are appear to behind it.

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
17 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known. Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program. Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly. Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated). The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance. Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).

Cons

No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career. Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers. Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule. Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All