Frustrated with resources - Staff Engineer Tesla Employee Review

3.0
16 Jan 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Preamble: this review mainly applies to battery cell testing org. As a company, we definitely get stuff done for better or for worse. If upper management says we are going to do something, we are definitely doing it. Some of those projects are actually very cool and inspiring, or downright fun. It is great to be an industry leader, not just in EVs but also in li-ion batteries. Tesla has accomplished unbelievable feats in a relatively small time, and it's exciting to be a part of it. There are a lot of very smart people working here. Generally, people are not jerks, or at least things have gotten better in that regard. It's a very accepting place (e.g. if you are LBGTQ, or minority, or female) at least among lower and mid-level staff.

Cons

I've been at Tesla a long time and I probably don't know anyone with 5+ years under their belt who isn't either completely jaded, or else has completely drank the kool-aid. The dividing line arises roughly between manager/senior manager, or staff/senior staff. Right below this dividing line there's a universal feeling of being unable to get adequate support (lab space, equipment, hires) to improve the status quo, because of a complete absence of mid-level employee empowerment, artificial scarcity, and executive hubris that we are all super smart and talented and can out-think any problem, never actually needing to scale up our test capabilities to handle said problems, (as doing so obviously would suggest we aren't super smart.) I've seen countless staff-level employees quit over this, getting frustrated being stuck without anywhere to grow (especially if you're not a kool-aid drinker), being denied resources, but still kept on staff...why? "Just in case" we ever decide to start listening to those talented 5+ years experience PhD staffers, I suppose? I have frequently thought about quitting over this same issue that caused so many of my former colleagues to quit. Management always paints a blue sky picture at every company meeting, getting very excited about the latest thing and long term growth prospects, but remains starkly untrusting of engineers who suggest anything's not going well, providing lip service suggesting you can simply come up and talk to them (director+ level with fully booked schedules at all times). But then when you do go up to this person, I have found no earnest intent for collaboration. They are quick to wave away your concern and do not promise any sort of resolution or path forward, even when you present them with a tangible and justified plan of action. In this way, management acts as if being frugal in the test lab is a perverse victory for the company rather than an enormous liability. We've been shifting to more and more of a program management culture, scaling the number of cell programs, by several fold, and exponentially growing the cell supply, while scaling support to the core technology by a mere fraction of that. In this new culture, program managers are responsible for task managing a lot of the "old ways" that were haphazardly established back when Tesla actually did have resource scarcity. Those old ways were wrought with false premises, but many engineers still demand running those same tests because (especially for newer employees) it's all they know, or (for old timers) they did speak up about it many times, but management would disingenuously tend to ask if there was any data to prove that a new proposed test would work to alleviate the problem, despite not actually helping to provide a pathway or resources to allow exploration of that very question. These grandfathered-in bare bones tests were arguably necessary for scaling the company in the early days, but should've only ever been attempted with the promise that eventually we'd do things right once we had the resources. Instead, we doubled down on these old ways, assuming they work great (even with evidence to the contrary) and we often cannot even adequately execute on that.

Explore other reviews about Tesla

5.0
14 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing perks like lease reimbursement, free charging, work culture, freedom

Cons

Lots of work added on over time, a lot expected of you at all times, long hours, black out period for end of quarter times.

3.0
27 Apr 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Completely casual dress code Flexibility to work from home when needed Always interesting to work at the factory If you look at the SEC filings, you can see that the top people are basically compensated the same as the other employees, which is a pleasant surprise. Many “beautiful people” here (male and female). Lots of eye candy. A lot of people complain about the pay, but they paid me more than my last company, where I had the same title LGBT friendly The product is cool, and really fun to drive If you’re in the right department, you might be able to drive a Tesla somewhat regularly. If not, there is an ongoing contest where you can be randomly selected to take one home for a couple of nights The company is still growing There is room to move geographically within Service, since Tesla owns the Service Centers Lots of “car guy” coworkers to keep conversations interesting Benefits actually got better and cheaper every year from 2012-2015, and stayed similar after that. I guess this was due to the company growing and getting better group rates. Regardless, not many people can say that. You’ll frequently come to work that day expecting to work on a certain project and end up on something totally different. This can be good and bad. Starting hours are typically flexible, which is a really nice perk. Nobody is making sure you’re in your seat at a certain time. Most employees are surprisingly responsive and friendly. Very heavy email-based communication, and it mostly works quite well. You get good at doing the best you can with the resources you have, rather than doing the best possible job. This isn’t necessarily a complaint, since it’s a valuable skill to have, but you should consider if you’re going to be okay in that kind of environment before applying.

Cons

Rare to be recognized, let alone thanked, for going above and beyond to accomplish something out of the ordinary. Once you've "done the impossible", it's just assumed that you can and will do it again and again from now on. Literally hundreds of people in one room, desks on top of each other, as many as possible in every little space. Companies claim that they’re being “modern” and “progressive” by not having offices and cubicles, but they’re just being cheap. Look at pictures of offices from the 1950’s. You’ll see the same hundreds of desks in a room. Yearly raises are typically less than the cost of living Work/life balance is mediocre at best Smallish yearly bonuses in the form of golden handcuffs. RSUs that vest over 4 years, so you’ll wait a long time to benefit from them Those who were hired before mid-2013 made a lot of money off stock options, but many of those people are leaving now that all of their options are used up. Revolving door. It’s hard to last more than a couple of years here. It’s always seemingly a few steps away from massive failure Very few processes in place, so work is done extremely inefficiently Very common to compose an email and see “This is no longer a valid Tesla address” The entire Service organization shares one budget. I am scrimping to save $50 on software while a barely-related manager wastes literally tens of thousands of dollars a week on cool toys, and it all comes from the same place. Everything’s urgent, and people try to name-drop that Elon’s watching this very project so I need to stop everything for them. Luckily those of us who have been around for a while see right through that charade. Technically, no 401(k) match, though if you’re careful with the health benefits you choose, you can end up with some leftover that can be diverted into the 401(k). Middle managers are very hit-and-miss. Many were promoted because a manager was needed and they were the only one who knew anything about the department. Much room for improvement here. Minimal leadership training. No real employee development opportunities. The results are just as bad as you’d expect. Massive inter-departmental struggles. Most of my problems can be traced to one power-hungry manager of a sister department. It only takes one person to ruin the work lives of many people. There are more meetings than I expected from this kind of company. Elon sent a great email about how wasteful meetings are, but people have fallen into old bad habits. Completely ineffective HR department Every department is grossly understaffed, just barely above the point of collapse. Nearly everyone has to work harder than they would if they were doing the same job at another company. Anything that they can do in house, they’ll do, rather than outsourcing to a supplier. There are people who spend their whole careers deciding “make vs. buy”… no need for them here, it seems. This is corporate arrogance, and it reduces quality, wastes human resources, and slows time to market in many cases. A positive side effect is that more products are made here in California than would be if they were outsourced. Inadequate parking Note to hiring managers at other companies: Watch out if someone from Tesla has “Project Manager” on their title. Many of these people are just general office workers with no skills beyond harassing people via email.

1431
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All