IMF Research Assistant (RAP) reviews

4.5

100% would recommend to a friend

(3 total reviews)

Kristalina Georgieva

Not enough data to show CEO approval

50% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

3 reviews
4.0
26 Mar 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fast-paced work, and working with international colleagues makes the experience very interesting. Obviously, researching cutting-edge policy issues is fascinating.

Cons

The social atmosphere can take some getting used to. Parts of it are very much dominated by older, white American and European men, which can make the work setting feel very stiff and competitive.

4.0
28 Dec 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Excellent opportunity to acquire relevant entry-level experience prior to graduate school - Optimal environment to explore potential career paths, particularly if unsure about a PhD in Economics or something else - Steep learning curve - Flexible working hours, beneficial for personal life balance - Potential to get involved in relevant publications - Tendency to be admitted at top graduate schools afterwords - Top salary and benefits (note that the actual salary offered is net of taxes; the values posted here are likely to be an estimate private sector salary around 27% higher than the actual amount received)

Cons

- Some senior staff have missed the technology train and often require rather silly assistance with very basic tasks (you can only be patient!...) - Work environment can become quite dry and boring - If you realize economics is not for you, it becomes difficult to keep up the motivation although the Research Assistant Program's beauty is that you are hired for 2 years and are actually expected to leave the organization at the end of your contract in order to pursue graduate studies or further professional experience elsewhere if judged necessary

Glassdoor has 758 IMF reviews submitted anonymously by IMF employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IMF is right for you.