NYTimes.com Reviews

3.0

51% would recommend to a friend

(14 total reviews)

Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr.

100% approve of CEO

74% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

14 reviews
2.0
28 Mar 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

NYTimes is a good strong organization with a very healthy corporate backing. Working for the technology department at the NYTimes will not come with the risk of layoffs or downsizing any time soon. You also get to work with a prestigious organization at which you can make a difference in the world. Hours are very flexible, management does not dictate the hours each employee must work.

Cons

Product Managers are cocky as hell and strive to take credit for all the good the engineer staff does. The reality is the Product team makes life a living hell for engineers at times. The NYTimes thinks they are a legitimate tech organization but have no clue how to be a tech org. They offer no competitive benefits or salaries and force engineering to work in the confounds of the legal team who decide most everything that can be done. Innovation is stifled and great ideas are held back. Additionally, because of the organization structure there is a strong propensity toward allowing horrible employees to stick around indefinitely. In particular if they are female or minority. While I myself enjoy the benefit of not having to worry about my job being at risk this makes life much more difficult as those who continuously screw up are given a free pass. Additionally, the NYTimes provides absolutely no career track for engineers other than management.

5.0
20 Jul 2014

Very Good for Freelance work

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good for very experienced writers and editors.

Cons

Must already be a professional with a long and successful job background. Must have a home office an meet deadlines.

2.0
22 Jul 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The reputation of the company will allow you to get into other companies once you decide to leave. You will fall into one of two categories: 1) You will learn a lot about various technologies and how they work at the Times by more Senior developers. 2) You'll be bored because you know about technologies already and be baffled at the level of disorganization surrounding processes and systems. They are in the middle of a lot of changes so you will be able to be influential in some major technology decisions.

Cons

The processes/systems are archaic and leave room for human error. Management doesn't help you to achieve your goals as much as they claim. There is a lot of double talk and confusing sets of information. You will get a lot of I don't knows from people in power and you are expected to do everything on your own without adequate tools and systems in place. The internal documentation is weak. The project management team doesn't have a consensus on how they are supposed to do their jobs. There aren't any formal definitions for what each role is responsible for on projects.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 14 Reviews

Glassdoor has 18 NYTimes.com reviews submitted anonymously by NYTimes.com employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NYTimes.com is right for you.