Saronic Reviews

3.8

66% would recommend to a friend

(29 total reviews)
avatar

Dino Mavrookas

89% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Saronic has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 29 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Saronic employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace and defence industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

29 reviews
2.0
16 Apr 2025

Hungry for talent, serious growing pains

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The majority of workers are awesome, there are some really talented people working on cool and exciting projects. If you want to work cutting edge technology or make a massive impact, this is a place to do it. Reputation wise, I know military in different states who have heard of Saronic and the contracts being negotiated so reputation and recognition is growing fast; it could potentially be a place to make your name career wise. Saronic provides snacks and lunches and spends significant money on perks and events if those things are important to you. Compensation is fair for most positions assuming you have a decent job title. Startups notoriously overpromote and Saronic is one of them, so if you stay on the right side of office politics you can promote into new areas and grow your career as they may put you into a role where you have no credentials or experience. If you’re willing to work hard and are looking for a place to stack your resume with achievements, Saronic is a great place to do it.

Cons

There is very low morale as pressure to meet deadlines is very high, and office politics is out of control. Saronic is growing fast, too fast and it’s chaotic. Under 150 people the company and culture were fantastic, with minimal office politics. Now they are hiring 20 people a month and firing 2-3 a week (half). Worse than that it started to become cliquey with strong rumors and gossip mills and all the office politics that come with too many non-performers hanging around the company couches or taking walks to the local coffee spot. Two of the main gossip spreaders are executive assistants to the founders so there are almost no secrets in the company. Within an hour of someone being fired, people outside the company already know about it as gossip travels fast. Unethical pro tip 1, if you want someone fired at Saronic, complain to the CEO directly, he is “very passionate” and has a hair trigger. The CEO has fired people off complaints at least 3 times I know of and once his eyes are on you, you’re gone. As a result of this, Saronic is currently under investigation with the EEOC and a possible lawsuit for discrimination against protected classes and wrongful termination. Unethical pro tip 2 (which might disappear after this review) they don’t do background checks on hires so a lot of the wrong people are slipping through and it shows in their performance. I’ve seen several instances of the failure to do background checks including the fallout it can cause. When it is brought up to management with proof of application fraud, they double down on protecting their mistakes; someone usually gets fired but at the 6-9 month mark and at great cost to employee morale. The hiring team is a nightmare, not only are they hiring too fast, they’re hiring the wrong people and not even bothering to interview internal referrals from some of the most respected performers in the company. I estimate about 25% of the company simply isn’t at the caliber that Saronic needs to honor its commitments being made in government contract negotiations. Some people would estimate that number much higher as Saronic has some strong talent carrying the whole company; one key person leaving can disrupt operations with a 5 month slowdown if not indefinitely.

1.0
23 Jul 2025

Politics, People and Problems

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Gov't funded start up - making it unique and first of its kind. - Notoriety and noteworthy - Good pay. -Paid Lunch That's it!

Cons

- CEO and Executive Leadership - HR does not represent the employees, they are only there to protect the image of the company and its protected individuals. - Unqualified Individuals who lack authority and leadership in Managerial positions, causing low morale amongst teams. - Opportunity for career growth stunted by office politics and clique-based behavior. - Lack of manufacturing inventory, so a lot of technicians feel like they are wasting their time coming to work. - Company has only been around nearly 3 years, and sustainability for growth is crumbling at their feets. Moving too fast for their own good and will be taking 5 steps forward and 10 steps back in long-run. - Slow productivity regardless of what is being said externally. -Proper platforms are not in place to properly innovate and there are a few experts in their give departments, everyone thinks they are right which means nobody is wrong which mean everyone is... Regardless the company is set up to successfully fail on a large scale. Culture is horrible, a lot of rumors, he say/she say, conniving, lying, and un-transparency. I wouldn't trust anybody you work with here which is very unfortunate. I would actually never recommend working here in the first place. The pay isn't worth all of the bs that comes with it and there is no loyalty, they will throw you away like the number you are.

1.0
26 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dino is great, the mission is great, and the lunch is free. Thanks for your service big Dino These are literally the only Pros.

Cons

There appear to be significant gaps in experience and accountability across several departments. In one instance, a newly hired manufacturing engineer (at a senior compensation level) frequently relied on technicians and inspectors for guidance on basic disposition decisions and work order processes. This created confusion in ownership and slowed issue resolution. There seems to be a disconnect between title, compensation, and demonstrated competency in certain roles. From a quality management standpoint, a substantial investment (approximately $300,000) was made in an inspection system that ultimately was not implemented or utilized effectively. Despite this outcome, there did not appear to be meaningful accountability or evaluation of the return on investment. This raised concerns about decision-making processes and oversight. When concerns about leadership effectiveness and quality risks were raised, HR involvement did not lead to a transparent resolution. Instead, the outcome felt discouraging to those attempting to raise process-related concerns. This has created hesitation among employees about speaking up regarding operational risks. There also appear to be rapid promotions within certain roles without clearly communicated qualifications or performance benchmarks. Greater transparency in advancement criteria would improve trust across teams. Additionally, there is a lack of standardized engineering documentation practices. Work instructions and design documentation are often created using general office software rather than industry-standard engineering tools, which can create inconsistencies and confusion in production environments.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 29 Reviews

Glassdoor has 31 Saronic reviews submitted anonymously by Saronic employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Saronic is right for you.